Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 389 N.W.2d 876.

226 citing documents.

Kuelbs v. Williams 609 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Kuelbs v. Williams 609 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y
Sandborg v. Blue Earth County 601 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Sandborg v. Blue Earth County 601 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Lewis v. Equitable Life As surance Soc’y
Wallin v. Minnesota Department of Corrections 598 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Wallin v. Minnesota Department of Corrections 598 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Moreno v. Crookston Times Printing Co. 594 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Moreno v. Crookston Times Printing Co. 594 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See, e.g., Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y of the United States, Stuempges, .
Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 561 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 561 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Lewis v. Equitable Life As surance Soc’y
Bol v. Cole 561 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1997
Bol v. Cole 561 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1997
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y of the United States, (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 593).
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y
Singleton v. Christ the Servant Evangelical Lutheran Church 541 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Singleton v. Christ the Servant Evangelical Lutheran Church 541 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Bolton v. Department of Human Services 540 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 1995
Bolton v. Department of Human Services 540 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 1995
See, e.g., Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y., Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.
Gorham v. Benson Optical 539 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Gorham v. Benson Optical 539 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See, e.g., Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y, (explaining current trends in construing employment contracts); see also Eklund v. Vincent Brass & Aluminum Co., 378 (Minn.App.1984) (relying on Grouse, court ruled that plaintiff produced sufficient evidence of reliance on promise to defeat summary judgment when employer’s fo
Kittler v. Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolff & Vierling 535 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Kittler v. Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolff & Vierling 535 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
“[Wjhether a [defamatory] communication is privileged is a question of law for the court to decide.” Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y
Alderman's Inc. v. Shanks 536 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1995
Alderman's Inc. v. Shanks 536 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1995
See Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y of the U.S., Raymond, 282 Minn. at 113 , d at 54 .
Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp. 532 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp. 532 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lundman v. McKown 530 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lundman v. McKown 530 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y
Bolton v. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES, STATE 527 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Bolton v. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES, STATE 527 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
“Whether an occasion is a proper one upon which to recognize a privilege is a question of law for the court to determine.” Lewis v. *156 Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y
Smits v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 525 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Smits v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 525 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y, Wilson v. Weight Watchers of Upper Midwest, Inc., pet.
Soucek v. Banham 524 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc. 521 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc. 521 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
False Statements The truth or falsity of a statement is inherently within the province of the jury and will not be overturned unless “the finding is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.” Lewis v. Equitable Life As surance Soc’y of the United States
Rouse v. Dunkley & Bennett, P.A. 520 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1994
Rouse v. Dunkley & Bennett, P.A. 520 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1994
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y
Brown v. Tonka Corp. 519 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Brown v. Tonka Corp. 519 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Pine River, d at 627 (personnel handbook provisions may be enforceable as part of original employment contract if they meet requirements for unilateral contract); (applying Pine River doctrine).
Alderman's Inc. v. Shanks 515 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Alderman's Inc. v. Shanks 515 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y, (reversal not required where erroneous instruction did not prejudice party by changing result).
Ward v. Employee Development Corp. 516 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ward v. Employee Development Corp. 516 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
see also Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y., (applying Pine River analysis); Hunt v. IBM Mid Am.
McGrath v. TCF Bank Savings, FSB 502 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
McGrath v. TCF Bank Savings, FSB 502 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y
LeBaron v. Minnesota Board of Public Defense 499 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
LeBaron v. Minnesota Board of Public Defense 499 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y
Gillson v. State Department of Natural Resources 492 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Gillson v. State Department of Natural Resources 492 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y, (truth is defense).
Thies v. St. Paul's Evangelical Lutheran Church of Litchfield 489 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1992