Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of J.W., 391 N.W.2d 791.

31 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: G.A.H. and S.T., Parents (A22-1065). In the Matter … Minn. 2023
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: G.A.H. and S.T., Parents (A22-1065). In the Matter … Minn. 2023
P. 32.02; (describing the rights to present evidence, witnesses, and arguments and to cross-examine witnesses in a termination proceeding as “part of the general guarantees of due process”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. L. G., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. H., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
ritten findings after trial, the district court recognized that while “there may be legitimate and legal reasons” for father to assert his right against self- incrimination under the Fifth Amendment, the court “may and d[id] draw an adverse inference against [father] from the specific questions he voluntarily chose not to answer” about whether he threatened E.T., -94 (Minn. 1986).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. B.-H. L. and W. A. T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Independent School District No. 477, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
North Mill Equipment Finance, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Kyle Wendell Else, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Any effort to submit adverse evidence on the matter or to attempt to contradict an admitted fact would be irrelevant because the issue is no longer [in] dispute.” see also Sclawr v. City of St.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: H. R. W. and M. D. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Santosky, 455 U.S. at 754, 102 S. Ct. at 1395 (citing Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 96 S. Ct. 893 (1976))
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, –93, 795 (Minn. 1986) (rejecting argument that sanctions violated parents’ rights to due process where “[t]he safety and well-being of [the children we]re at issue”); Geske, d at 68, 70 (rejecting First Amendment challenge to injunction against publication of pictures of children, reasoning we “ha[ve]
In Re the Welfare of the Child of S.S.W. 767 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Welfare of the Child of S.S.W. 767 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
The department’s citation to also undercuts its argument.
C.O. v. Doe 757 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2008
C.O. v. Doe 757 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2008
893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976) (cited in ).
In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(holding refusal to allow parents in TPR proceeding to cross-examine opposing witnesses or present witnesses on own behalf not abuse of discretion or denial of due process).
In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(holding refusal to allow parents in TPR proceeding to cross-examine opposing witnesses or present witnesses on own behalf not abuse of discretion or denial of due process).
Matter of Welfare of AY-J. 558 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Matter of Welfare of AY-J. 558 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
29, 1995); (child’s interests in establishing parentage prevailed over father’s right to hearing on the merits).
In Re the Welfare of S.R.A. 527 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re the Welfare of S.R.A. 527 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
1 (child’s interests in establishing parentage prevailed over father’s right to a hearing on the merits when father deprived factfinder of the most accurate evidence available); Doe v. Hennepin County, 858 F.2d 1325, 1329 (8th Cir.1988) (“the state may intervene on behalf of abused children, thereby inf
Commissioner v. Fort 479 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1992
Commissioner v. Fort 479 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1992
In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 415 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1987
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 415 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1987
In re the Welfare of J.K.M. 397 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In re the Welfare of J.K.M. 397 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In making a finding of neglect the welfare of the child involved is the critical factor in the final determination.- , (Minn.1986).