Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Olson v. Olson, 392 N.W.2d 338.

72 citing documents.

Kenneth S. Benigni v. St. Louis County, State of Minnesota, by Department of Human Services, Lake Superior Community … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kenneth S. Benigni v. St. Louis County, State of Minnesota, by Department of Human Services, Lake Superior Community … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Shuqin Liu v. Waymouth Farms, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Shuqin Liu v. Waymouth Farms, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
clearly cannot constitute bias.”
In re Guardianship of Charles Rottelo, Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re Guardianship of Charles Rottelo, Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re: The Burial of Irina Kurdyumova (Deceased) Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re: The Burial of Irina Kurdyumova (Deceased) Minn. Ct. App. 2015
3 (Minn. App. 1986) (“Prior adverse rulings, however, clearly cannot constitute bias .
Joshua Steven Parsons v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Joshua Steven Parsons v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
9, 1989); 13 (stating that “[p]rior adverse rulings .
State of Minnesota v. Marlon Terrell Pratt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Marlon Terrell Pratt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
9, 1989); (“Prior adverse rulings .
Robert Bonczek v. Donald Erickson, DDS, Mark Wilson, Periodontist, Mayo Clinic - Rochester, University of Minnesota - Minneapolis, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Bonczek v. Donald Erickson, DDS, Mark Wilson, Periodontist, Mayo Clinic - Rochester, University of Minnesota - Minneapolis, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that “[p]rior adverse rulings .
State Ex Rel. Guth v. Fabian 716 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State Ex Rel. Guth v. Fabian 716 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(stating that judicial bias cannot be based simply on a litigant’s subjective belief); (stating that prior adverse rulings do not constitute bias).
Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Schroeder 693 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Schroeder 693 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Greer v. State 673 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2004
Greer v. State 673 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2004
We agree with the Minnesota Court of Appeals, which has held that “[p]rior adverse rulings * * * clearly cannot constitute bias * * *.” (citing United States v. Anderson, 433 F.2d 856, 860 (8th Cir.1970) (holding that prior rulings do not establish bias, even if erroneous)).
State v. Kramer 441 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Kramer 441 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(citing U.S. v. Anderson, 433 F.2d 856, 860 (8th Cir.1970)).