Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Case v. Pung, 413 N.W.2d 261.

26 citing documents.

Antoine C. Whitner v. Tracy Beltz Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Antoine C. Whitner v. Tracy Beltz Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(stating that the petitioner has the burden of showing the illegality of their detention), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Kim Ouk, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(stating that the petitioner has the burden of showing 1 At the time of Ouk’s parole hearing in 2023, Minnesota law did not require that a parole hearing be held within a specific timeframe.
Ronald Lindsey Reed v. Minnesota Department of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Ronald Lindsey Reed v. Minnesota Department of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that the petitioner has the burden of showing that they are being illegally detained), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Raymond Semler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Case v. Pung , review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota ex rel. Gerald Browneagle, Appellant, vs. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
But an evidentiary hearing is not required if “the petitioner has not alleged sufficient facts to constitute a prima facie case for relief.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Terrance Friend, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Jerry Duwenhoegger, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
on appellant’s petition because appellant “(1) failed to state a prima facie case for habeas relief; (2) that no disputed issues of material fact exist; and (3) that the issues raised by [appellant] can be decided as a matter of law.” “[A] habeas corpus hearing is not ne eded when the petitioner has not alleged sufficient facts to constitute a prima facie case for relief.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Cesar De La Garza, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A district court need not hold a hearing on a habeas corpus petition unless the petitioner has “alleged sufficient facts to constitute a prima facie case for relief.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
James Wieseler, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Jacquet Deon Munn, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Eric Matthew Hopper v. Tom Roy, Minnesota Commissioner of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Eric Matthew Hopper v. Tom Roy, Minnesota Commissioner of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Anthony Alan Early v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Anthony Alan Early v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A district court need not hold a hearing on the petition unless the petitioner has “alleged sufficient facts to constitute a prima facie case for relief,” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Darrel Mckee v. Steve Hammer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Darrel Mckee v. Steve Hammer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
3 “The burden is on the petitioner to show the illegality of his detention.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Jerry Duwenhoegger, Sr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jerry Duwenhoegger, Sr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The burden is on the petitioner to show the illegality of his detention.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Ronald Dallmann v. Tom Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ronald Dallmann v. Tom Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The burden is on the petitioner to show the illegality of his detention.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Ricky James Bedell v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections 853 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ricky James Bedell v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections 853 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The burden is on the petitioner to show the illegality of his detention.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Loyd v. Fabian 682 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Loyd v. Fabian 682 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
“The burden is on the petitioner to show the illegality of his detention.” review denied (Minn. Nov.