Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Beach v. Anderson, 417 N.W.2d 709.

22 citing documents.

Homestead Acres Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Homestead Acres Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Pretrial settlements are “greatly favored, and such agreements will not lightly be set aside by Minnesota courts.” -12 (Minn. App. 1988), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Kristie Kollmann, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Reaching a settlement without trial is “greatly favored, and such agreements will not lightly be set aside by Minnesota courts.” - 12 (Minn. App. 1988), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Jeremy J. Cobb, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-12 (Minn. App. 1988), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Estate of: Steven C. Kukowski, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-12 (Minn. App. 1988), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Distinguished Doran Development, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-14 (Minn. App. 1988), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Mohammad Sonbol v. Green and White Taxi Cab Company, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mohammad Sonbol v. Green and White Taxi Cab Company, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See id.; -14 (Minn. App. 1988) (holding that settlement stipulation memorialized on the record and transcribed by a court reporter satisfied writing requirement of the statute of frauds), review denied (Minn. Mar.
JAB, Inc., d/b/a Future Concepts Studio & Spa v. Sara Naegle 867 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
JAB, Inc., d/b/a Future Concepts Studio & Spa v. Sara Naegle 867 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d among the parties,” it cannot be enforced, and, as the district court concluded, JAB’s action for breach cannot be maintained.2 One reason for the statute-of-frauds requirement that consideration be in writing is to “guard[] against leaving the proof of a contract which is to run beyond a year dependent on the memory and truthfulness of witnesses and the parties.” (quotation omitted) (concluding that covenant not to compete recorded by court reporter was adequately memorialized), review denied
TNT Properties, Ltd. v. Tri-Star Developers LLC 677 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
TNT Properties, Ltd. v. Tri-Star Developers LLC 677 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Rice Lake Contracting Corp. v. Rust Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 549 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Rice Lake Contracting Corp. v. Rust Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 549 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Eggleston v. Keller Drug Co., 265 Minn. 78, 81-82 , (“It is settled in this state that good-faith settlements are favored and are presumed to be valid.”); (“reliance on * * * settlements should be encouraged” to advance the “efforts of trial courts to hear and determine [an] ever-increasing number of eases” (quoting Eggleston, 265 Minn. at 82 , d at 307 )); (“Settlement agree
Drake v. Ryan 498 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Drake v. Ryan 498 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Cos., -12 (Minn.App.1988), pet.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Chiropractic Mutual Insurance Co. 496 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Chiropractic Mutual Insurance Co. 496 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Ryan v. Ryan, 292 Minn. 52, 55 , pet.
Schumann v. Northtown Insurance Agency, Inc. 452 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Schumann v. Northtown Insurance Agency, Inc. 452 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Paul Insurance Companies, -12 (Minn.Ct.App.1988), pet.
Weber v. Sentry Insurance 442 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Weber v. Sentry Insurance 442 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-12 (Minn.Ct.App.1988), pet.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by