Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lyle, 409 N.W.2d 549.

21 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Joseph Robert Clay Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Robert Clay Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” (citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 31 (1970)); -53 (Minn. App. 1987) (applying the constitutional standard to a plea petition).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(when a defendant is represented by counsel it is presumed that he has been “informed of the nature of the offense and of his alternatives”) ().
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” Raleigh, d at 94 (citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 31 (1970)); State v. Lyle , - 53 (Minn. App. 1987) (applying the constitutional standard to a plea petition) .
Nicholas Patrick Pankuch, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Mitchell Le Dac Ho, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The record must show that the defendant understood the elements of the offense and any available defenses, 20 and the possible conseque nces of conviction.” State v. Lyle , -52 (Minn. App. 1987).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The record must show that the defendant understood the elements of the offense and any available defenses, and the possible consequences of conviction.” -52 (Minn. App. 1987).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S.L.S., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S.L.S., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Juanel Anthony Mikulak Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Juanel Anthony Mikulak Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION Before accepting a guilty plea, “the [district] court must determine whether the plea is ‘accurate, voluntary and intelligent (i.e., knowingly and understandingly made)’, and whether there is an adequate factual basis for the plea on the record.” ().
Crystal Marie Vodinelich v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Crystal Marie Vodinelich v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The factual basis requirement is usually satisfied when the court asks the defendant to express in his own words what happened.”
Maurion Jameal Travis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Maurion Jameal Travis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But “[w]hen a defendant is represented by counsel, it is generally presumed that he has been informed of the nature of the offense.”
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Eugene Quinn Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Eugene Quinn Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“When a defendant is represented by counsel, it is generally presumed that he has been informed of the nature of the offense.”
State v. Hagen 690 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Hagen 690 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-53 (Minn.App.1987) (holding that factual basis had to be established at time of guilty plea, not later in presentence investigation).
Lundin v. State 430 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lundin v. State 430 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1988

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by