Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Commission, 428 N.W.2d 815.

37 citing documents.

Emily Anick, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
This context is distinct from a case like Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Commission, where “the social context of [the] statements, office gossip and banter, would not lead a listener to believe them as statements of fact.”
James Jesse Hunter, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Airport Comm’n, (“As a matter of law, statements that appellant is a ‘fluffy,’ a ‘bitch,’ or flirtatious are too imprecise in nature to be actionable defamatory statements.”) .
Ashlee Kay Sames, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Airport Comm’n, , 821 (Minn. App. 1988) (concluding that the c oworkers’ statements referring to the plaintiff as a “fluffy,” a “bitch,” and “flirtatious” were, as a matter of law, “too imprecise in nature to be actionable defamatory statements.”).
In the Matter of the John P. Weitzel and Mary M. Weitzel 2007 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Terese M. … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Airport Comm’n, d 815, 822 (Minn. App. 1988) (stating that this implied covenant does not apply to employment contracts).
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester 846 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester 846 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Airport Comm’n, (“As a matter of law, statements that appellant is a ‘fluffy,’ a ‘b-tch,’ or flirtatious are too imprecise in nature to be actionable defamatory statements.”).
Minnwest Bank Central v. Flagship Properties LLC 689 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Minnwest Bank Central v. Flagship Properties LLC 689 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Stead-Bowers v. Langley 636 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Stead-Bowers v. Langley 636 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Bebo v. Delander 632 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Bebo v. Delander 632 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., (vulgarity is not actionable unless “especially shocking or egregious”), review denied (Minn. June 19, 1991); Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Comm’n, 823 (Minn.App.1988) (comments re *740 garding personal characteristics or social life not defamatory, even if more extreme than that usually encountered).
Jensen v. Walsh 609 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Jensen v. Walsh 609 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Comm’n
Ferrell v. Cross 543 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Ferrell v. Cross 543 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Comm’n
Geraci v. Eckankar 526 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Geraci v. Eckankar 526 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
for rev. denied (Minn. June 19, 1991); Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Comm’n, (“fluffy,” “b-tch,” flirtatious not actionable).
Carlson v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Carlson v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Comm’n, -24 (Minn.App.1988).
Strauss v. Thorne 490 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Strauss v. Thorne 490 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co., Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Comm’n, (Minn.App.
M.H. v. Caritas Family Services 475 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
M.H. v. Caritas Family Services 475 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Comm’n, -24 (Minn.App.1988) (negligent infliction of emotional distress claim proper where plaintiff has suffered a direct invasion of her rights, such as defamation, malicious prosecution or other willful or wanton conduct).
Michaelson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 474 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Michaelson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 474 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Comm’n
Weissman v. Sri Lanka Curry House, Inc. 469 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Weissman v. Sri Lanka Curry House, Inc. 469 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
1071 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1177 (1991); Lee v. Metropolitan Airports Comm’n
Lund v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co. 467 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Lund v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co. 467 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Comm’n, coworkers had referred to the plaintiff as a “fluffy,” a “bitch,” and flirtatious.
Glarner v. Time Insurance Co. 465 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Glarner v. Time Insurance Co. 465 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Com ’n
Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 448 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Distinguished Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 448 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
because the statement there was made by a fellow dispatcher, not a manager.
Foley v. WCCO Television, Inc. 449 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1989

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by