Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Johnson, 498 N.W.2d 10.
- Johnson v. State 697 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 2005
- Johnson v. State 697 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 2005
- State v. DeRosier 695 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 2005
- State v. DeRosier 695 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 2005
- State v. Ray 659 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 2003
-
State v. Ray
659 N.W.2d 736
Minn. 2003
(holding that where delays are the result of the defendant’s actions, there is no speedy trial violation).
- State v. Traylor 656 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 2003
-
State v. Traylor
656 N.W.2d 885
Minn. 2003
See, Jobe, d at 419 ; Schwartz, d at 427-28 .
- State v. Traylor 641 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
State v. Traylor
641 N.W.2d 335
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See, Jobe, d at 420 n. 4; Schwartz, d at 427-28 .
- In Re the Welfare of V.D.M. 623 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- In Re the Welfare of V.D.M. 623 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Windish 590 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 1999
-
State v. Windish
590 N.W.2d 311
Minn. 1999
at *4 ( (stating that “prompt and forceful” speedy trial assertions “are key to a court’s evaluation of a speedy trial claim”).
- Johnson v. State 528 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1995
- Johnson v. State 528 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1995
- State v. Hummert 905 P.2d 493 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
- State v. Bloom 516 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1994
- State v. Bloom 516 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1994
- State v. Alt 505 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1993
- State v. Alt 505 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1993
- State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Alt 504 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Alt 504 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1993