State v. Strom
Cited by
- In re Petition for Reinstatement of Minn. 2021
- In re Amoun Vang Sayaovong 909 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 2018
- Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam Minn. 2018
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Pearson 888 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 2016
- In Re PETITION FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Frank Arend SCHULTE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration … 869 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 2015
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mark Alan GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration … 860 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 2015
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Montez 812 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 2012
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Varriano 755 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2008
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Overboe 745 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 2008
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Nelson 733 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 2007
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ek 643 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2002
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Jellinger 625 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 2001
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Hanson 543 N.W.2d 84
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals filed September 26, 1995, 1995 WTL 565062, answering a question certified by the district court be, and the same is, affirmed. The district court denied Strom’s motion to dismiss four counts of gross misdemeanor DWI on double jeopardy grounds but certified the double jeopardy question to the court of appeals as important and doubtful. The court of appeals answered the question in the negative. This case is controlled by our decision in State v. Hanson, 543 N.W.2d 84 (Minn.1996). The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. BY THE COURT: /s/ Alexander M. Keith Chief Justice