Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Harris, 589 N.W.2d 782.

174 citing documents.

Onyelobi v. State 932 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2019
The issuing judge is tasked with making "a practical, common-sense decision," State v. Yarbrough , , 622 (Minn. 2014), and a reviewing court is limited to determining whether there was a "substantial basis" for that decision, State v. Harris , , 788 (Minn. 1999) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-91 (Minn. 1999) (quotation omitted).2 II.
Oji Konata Markham, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Unlike proof beyond a reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence, probable cause requires only a probability or substantial chance of criminal activity, not an actual showing of such activity.” State v. Harris , -91 (Minn. 1999) (quotation omitted).
Shawn Richard Burrington, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Minn. Stat. § 626.08 (2018)
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Minn. Stat. § 626.08 (2018); State v. Harris
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Unlike proof beyond a reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence, proba ble cause requires only a probability or substantial chance of criminal activity, not an actual showing of such activity.” -91 (Minn. 1999) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Gundy 915 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Gundy 915 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Harris , , 788 (Minn. 1999).
A17-1623 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
at 353 (-91 (Minn. 1999)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A search warrant may be issued only upon a finding of probable cause by a neutral and detached magistrate.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A search warrant may be issued only upon a finding of probable cause by a neutral an d detached magistrate.” see Minn. Stat. § 626.08 (2014).
State of Minnesota v. Dennis James McCormick Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Dennis James McCormick Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Jared S. O�Donnell Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jared S. O�Donnell Minn. Ct. App. 2016
16, 2004); d 782, 788 (Minn. 1999) (upholding probable cause for a warrant in part because “[c]ommon sense permits an inference that [certain] documents would normally be found in a person’s home”).
State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Lemaine Barker 888 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Lemaine Barker 888 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Unlike proof beyond a reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence, probable cause requires only a probability or substantial chance of criminal activity, not an actual showing of such activity.” -91 (Minn. 1999) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Wyatt Morris Howard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Wyatt Morris Howard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Even if each component is judged unsubstantial, the components viewed together may reveal an internal coherence that gives weight to the whole.’” ().
State of Minnesota v. Debra Lee Fawcett 884 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Debra Lee Fawcett 884 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 2016
741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965)); (“[W]e give ‘great deference to the issuing judge’s determination’ of probable cause for a search warrant.” ()); Rochefort, d at 804 (same); (“[T]he resolution, of doubtful or marginal cases should be ‘largely determined by the preference to be accorded warrants.’ ” (quoting Wiley, d at 268 )).
In the Matter of the Appeal by Kind Heart Daycare, Inc. of the Order of License Revocation and … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Cornelius Kinte Payton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Appeal by Kind Heart Daycare, Inc. of the Order of License Revocation and … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Unlike proof beyond a reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence, probable cause requires only a probability or substantial chance of criminal activity, not an actual showing of such activity.” –91 (Minn. 1999) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Cornelius Kinte Payton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
ta Supreme Court held that in order to establish the necessary nexus between the murder or attempted-murder and the underlying felony, “the state must prove that the fatal wound was inflicted during the same chain of events [in which the underlying felony took place] so that the requisite time, distance, and causal relationship between the felony and killing are established.” -92 (Minn. 1999) (quotation and citations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Steven Jacobs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Steven Jacobs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(upholding probable cause for a warrant in part because “[c]ommon sense permits an inference that such [identifying] documents would normally be found in a person’s home”); (“[T]he issuing judge [of a search warrant] is entitled to draw commo
State of Minnesota v. Andre Thomas Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Andre Thomas Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Minn. Stat. § 626.08 (2012)
State of Minnesota v. Luis Rodolfo Rojas-Santos Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Luis Rodolfo Rojas-Santos Minn. Ct. App. 2015
To ensure that police are not discouraged from seeking a warrant, “the resolution of doubtful or marginal cases should be largely determined by the preference to be accorded warrants.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Joseph Simonson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Joseph Simonson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Minn. Stat. § 626.08 (2012)
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Minn. Stat. § 626.08 (2012)
State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 869 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 869 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2015
791 n. 1 (Minn.1999); , 864 n. 4 (Minn.1991); , 701 n. 1 (Minn.1990); , 269 n. 2 (Minn.1985); , 929 n. 7 (Minn.2006) (resolving the issue on statutory grounds and declining to c
State of Minnesota v. Alondre Ramone Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alondre Ramone Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Minn. Stat. § 626.08 (2012)
State of Minnesota v. Roger Earl Holland 865 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Roger Earl Holland 865 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Minn. Stat. § 626.08 (2012)
State of Minnesota v. Timothy George Clark Minn. Ct. App. 2015