Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Shaw v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, 594 N.W.2d 187.

29 citing documents.

Amber Brown, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Minn., rev. denied (Minn. July 28, 1999).
Jun Xiao, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Minn., d 187, 1 90-92 (Minn. App. 1999) (holding that “[a] breach of contract claim based on a termination decision by the University of Minnesota is reviewed only on a writ of certiorari” and affirming the district court’s determination that it lacked subject -matter jurisdiction to review the claim), review denied (Minn. July
Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Minn., review denied (Minn. July 28, 1999).
John R. Voita, Special Administrator of the Estate of Vivian P. Voita v. Thomas Parrish Minn. Ct. App. 2015
John R. Voita, Special Administrator of the Estate of Vivian P. Voita v. Thomas Parrish Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Minn., review denied (Minn. July 28, 1999).
Jensen Field Relocation Claims Jensen Field, Inc. v. Board of Regents 817 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Jensen Field Relocation Claims Jensen Field, Inc. v. Board of Regents 817 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
of Minn., review denied (Minn. July 28, 1999).
Brenny v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 813 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Brenny v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 813 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
of Regents, revieiu denied (Minn. July 28, 1999); see Williams v. Bd.
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 802 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 802 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
of Regents, review denied (Minn. July 28, 1999).
Williams v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV. 763 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Williams v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV. 763 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Johnson v. Wright 682 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Johnson v. Wright 682 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
of Minn., review denied (Minn. July 28, 1999).
In Re the Appeal of the Selection Process for the Position of Electrician 674 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Appeal of the Selection Process for the Position of Electrician 674 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
of Regents, review denied (Minn. July 28, 1999).
University of Minnesota v. Woolley 659 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
University of Minnesota v. Woolley 659 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
of Minn., review denied (Minn. July 28, 1999).
City of Hibbing v. Baratto 620 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
City of Hibbing v. Baratto 620 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
revieiv denied (Minn. July 28, 1999), governs this case.
Maye v. University of Minnesota 615 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Maye v. University of Minnesota 615 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
§ 606.01 (1998) is the only method available for review of a university decision.”
Stephens v. Board of Regents of University of Minnesota 614 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Stephens v. Board of Regents of University of Minnesota 614 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
§ 606.01-.06 (1998) (providing for review by writ of certiorari); (holding that as a general rule, certiorari is “the only method available for [judicial] review of a universi *769 ty decision”), review denied (Minn. July 28, 1999).
State v. Tokheim 611 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Tokheim 611 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
review denied (Minn. July 28, 1999).
City of Minneapolis v. Meldahl 607 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
City of Minneapolis v. Meldahl 607 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
of Minn., review denied (Minn. July 28,1999).