Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. LaTourelle, 343 N.W.2d 277.

222 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Quintin Deshun Dye 871 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Quintin Deshun Dye 871 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Nasson Chaney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Nasson Chaney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Travis Earl Stringer Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Travis Earl Stringer Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Orlando Delgado Espinosa Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Orlando Delgado Espinosa Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Ty Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Ty Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
the district court must adhere to the following procedure when adjudicating guilt for alternate counts of the same criminal offense: We hold that the proper procedure to be followed by the [district] court when the defendant is convicted on more th
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Thomas Leonsaco Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Thomas Leonsaco Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Minn. Stat. § 609.04 (2010); -66 (Minn. 1999)
State of Minnesota v. Claude Riley Crockson, Jr. 854 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Claude Riley Crockson, Jr. 854 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eric Jerome Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eric Jerome Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[T]he proper procedure to be followed by the trial court when the defendant is convicted on more than one charge for the same act is for the court to adjudicate formally 13 and impose sentence on one count only.” (), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Beane 840 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Beane 840 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Grampre 766 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Grampre 766 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Similarly, the supreme court vacated two of three convictions of murder although only one person was murdered.
Spann v. State 740 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 2007
Spann v. State 740 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 2007
If the adjudicated conviction is later vacated for a reason not relevant to the remaining unadjudicated conviction(s), one of the remaining unadjudi-cated convictions can then be formally adjudicated and sentence imposed, with credit, of course, given for time already served on the vacated sentence.” ().
State v. Clark 739 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2007
State v. Clark 739 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2007
(“If the adjudicated conviction is later vacated * * *, one of the remaining unadjudicated convictions can then be formally adjudicated and sentence imposed, with credit * * * given for time already served on the vacated sentence.”).
State v. Vance 734 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 2007
State v. Vance 734 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 2007
State v. Martinez 725 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 2007
State v. Martinez 725 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 2007
: “[T]he proper procedure to be followed by the trial court when the defendant is convicted on more than one charge for the same act is for the court to adjudicate formally and impose sentence on one count only.” (Emphasis added.)
State v. Reese 692 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 2005
State v. Reese 692 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 2005
State v. Lopez-Rios 669 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 2003
State v. Lopez-Rios 669 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 2003
State v. Hoelzel 639 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2002
State v. Hoelzel 639 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2002
State v. Lindsey 632 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2001
State v. Lindsey 632 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2001
at 766 () (alterations in original).
State v. Matelski 622 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Matelski 622 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Pflepsen 590 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1999
State v. Pflepsen 590 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1999
: [Wjhen the defendant is convicted on more than one charge for the same act * * * the court [is] to adjudicate formally and impose sentence on one count only.
State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
-83 (Minn.1984); cert, denied, 444 U.S. 973 , 100 S.Ct.
State v. Wilson 539 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1995
State v. Wilson 539 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1995
State v. Brodie 529 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Brodie 529 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Jolley 508 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1993
State v. Jolley 508 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1993
467 , 62 L.Ed.2d 388 (1979), this court not only recommended using CRIMJIG 6.02, the instruction used here, but also stated, “We hold that an instruction on capacity to control behavior need not be given.” Subsequently, -95 (Minn. 1982), we reaffirmed what we said in Larson .
State v. Brink 500 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Brink 500 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See, (standard for insanity not changed by Rawland , though fact finder may consider competent evidence relating to cognition, volition, and capacity to control behavior); State v. Wendler, 312 Minn. 432, 434 , -68 (Minn.1977) (same).