Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. LaTourelle, 343 N.W.2d 277.

226 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Jacob Thomas Price Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Michael Steel Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Damion John Gullickson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(holding that “the proper procedure to be followed by the trial court when the defendant is convicted on more than one charge for the same act is for the court to adjudicate formally and impose sentence on one count only.
State of Minnesota v. Lee Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2019
9 The remaining conviction(s) should not be formally adjudicated at this time.”
State of Minnesota v. Edward Gary Kowalzyk Minn. Ct. App. 2019
is for the court to adjudicate formally and impose sentence on one count only .”
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Desean Howard Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that the proper procedure “when the defendant is convicted on more than one charge for the same act is for the court to adjudicate formally and impose sentence on one count only,” and to leave the remaining count unadjudicated); re
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Dupree Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. LaTourelle , 12 (“[T]he proper procedure to be followed by the trial court when the defendant is convicted on more than one charge for the same act is for the court to adjudicate formally and impose sentence on one count only.”).
State of Minnesota v. Rene Mercedes Rivas-Hernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Rian Lynn Thibeau Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Victor Wayne Lynch Minn. Ct. App. 2019
18 Pflepsen, d at 766 ().
State of Minnesota v. Jason Ronald Stauffer Minn. Ct. App. 2019
12 515, 522-23 (Minn. 2013); see State v. LaTourelle , (stating that when a defendant is found guilty on multiple charges for the same act, the district court should formally adjudicate and impose sentence on only one count).
State of Minnesota v. Duane John BlackBull Minn. Ct. App. 2018
2013) (quotation omitted); (stating that when a defenda nt is found guilty on multiple charges for the same act, the district court should formally adjudicate and impose sentence on only one count).
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Raymond Smoot Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The proper procedure to be followed by the [district] court when the [appellant] is convicted on more than one charge for th e same act is for the court to adjudicate formally and impose sentence on one count only” and “[t]he rema ining conviction(s) should not be formally adjudicated at this time.”
State of Minnesota v. Jesus Gonzalez Sotelo Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(stating that the proper procedure “when the defendant is convicted on more than one charge for the same act is for the court to adjudicate formally and impose sentence on one count only,” and to leave the remaining count unadjudicated); r
State of Minnesota v. Larry Gene Lester Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The remaining conviction(s) should not be formally adj udicated at this time.” State v. LaTourelle
State of Minnesota v. Sergio Alejandro Zapata Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Walker 913 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Walker 913 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Pflepsen , d at 767 ; see also State v. LaTourelle , , 284 (Minn. 1984) (stating that the proper procedure "when the defendant is convicted on more than one charge for the same act is for the court to adjudicate formally and impose sentence on one count only," and to leave the remaining count unadjudicated).
State of Minnesota v. Shane Anthony Spicer Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Lamee Motley Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See, e.g., State v. LaTourelle
State of Minnesota v. Mohamed Ali Elmi Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of: D. A. D., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Clint Scott Bearce Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. David Brandyn Earley Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Israel Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Douglas Frederick Gratz Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Blanshan Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Reginald Oranz Calhoun Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1(4), defines “[a]n included offense” as “[a] crime necessarily proved if the crime charged were proved.” Additionally, “[w]hen the defendant is convicted on more than one charge for the same act the court is to adjudicate formally and impose sentence on one count only.” (alterations omitted) (quotation 17 omitted)
State of Minnesota v. Ian Ryo Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Ian Ryo Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Noor Muhina Salim Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Noor Muhina Salim Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Tchad Tu Henderson 890 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Tchad Tu Henderson 890 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(holding that, although a defendant may be “convicted on more than one charge for the same act,” the district court must only “adjudicate formally and impose sentence on one count”).
State of Minnesota v. Jose Amador Molina Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Enamidem Celestine Okon v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Enamidem Celestine Okon v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jose Amador Molina Minn. Ct. App. 2016
If the adjudicated conviction is later vacated for a reason not relevant to the remaining unadjudicated conviction(s), one of the remaining unadjudicated convictions can then be formally adjudicated and sentence imposed, with credit, of course, given for time already served on the vacated sentence.’” ()).
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Piper Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Piper Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Daniel Gustafson v. Commissioner of Human Services 884 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Daniel Gustafson v. Commissioner of Human Services 884 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Bruce Everett Boyd Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Bruce Everett Boyd Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jesse B. Bennett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jesse B. Bennett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In this circumstance, we remand to the district court to vacate and “adjudicate formally and impose sentence on one count only.”
State of Minnesota v. Cheng Pao Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Cheng Pao Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Gatwech Yiek Thach Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Gatwech Yiek Thach Minn. Ct. App. 2016