Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Kottke v. Kottke, 353 N.W.2d 633.

77 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See, ( affirming an award of nonmarital property based largely on testimony); (same), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Kristy Ann Ryan, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A party claiming property is nonmarital “ must produce demonstrable proof to overcome the marital property presumption.” Erdahl v. Erdahl , see also Kottke v. Kottke , (stating that the standard of proof is a preponderance of the evidence) , review denied (Minn. Dec.
A18-1408 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(quotation marks omitted), review denied (Minn. Dec.
Leon Asle Baxter v. Debra Kay Baxter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Leon Asle Baxter v. Debra Kay Baxter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 258, 260-61 (Minn. App. 1995); 6 review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Patricia Elaine Radziwill v. Michael Radziwill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Patricia Elaine Radziwill v. Michael Radziwill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
5 d 633, 637 (Minn. App. 1984), review denied (Minn. Dec.
Marriage of Gessner v. Gessner 487 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Gessner v. Gessner 487 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In re the Marriage of Freeing v. Freeing 479 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Freking v. Freking 479 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Freking v. Freking 479 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kottke v. Kottke , , 636 (Minn.App.
In re the Marriage of Freeing v. Freeing 479 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Pettit v. Pettit 472 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Pettit v. Pettit 472 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(if asset is readily traceable to inheritance, it is non-marital), pet.
Marriage of Swick v. Swick 467 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Swick v. Swick 467 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
To establish property as nonmarital, a spouse must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he/she acquired the asset “ % exchange for’ non-marital property.” pet.
Marriage of Rask v. Rask 445 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Rask v. Rask 445 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of McCulloch v. McCulloch 435 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of McCulloch v. McCulloch 435 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In dissolution actions, “the district court is given broad discretion regarding * * * spousal maintenance.” and “[r]elated findings of fact must be upheld unless clearly erroneous.” pet.
Marriage of Fastner v. Fastner 427 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Fastner v. Fastner 427 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Griffith v. Griffith 415 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Griffith v. Griffith 415 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
This court’s 1984 rejected the claim that non-marital assets placed in a joint checking account were transmuted into marital assets.
Marriage of Amundson v. Amundson 414 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Amundson v. Amundson 414 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Mikoda v. Mikoda 413 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Mikoda v. Mikoda 413 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See also Taylor, d at 798 (although division of retirement benefits at time of dissolution is preferred, fixed percentage value should be used where present value determination is unacceptably speculative); pet.
Marriage of Kvenild v. Kvenild 410 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kvenild v. Kvenild 410 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Petschel v. Petschel 406 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Roel v. Roel 406 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Roel v. Roel 406 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Petschel v. Petschel 406 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hafner v. Hafner 406 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hafner v. Hafner 406 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Coffel v. Coffel 400 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Coffel v. Coffel 400 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 392 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 392 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Tracing to a nonmari-tal source is required when “the owner shows * * * that the asset was ‘acquired in exchange for’ nonmarital property.” pet.
Marriage of Nash v. Nash 388 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nash v. Nash 388 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 388 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 388 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Doherty v. Doherty 388 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Doherty v. Doherty 388 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Doering v. Doering 385 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Doering v. Doering 385 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Erdahl v. Erdahl 384 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1986