Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Kennedy v. Kennedy, 376 N.W.2d 702.

27 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
that “[e] ven if a property settlement was due and owing to [wife], the property settlement could have been s ubject to payments over time or from the disposition of other assets such as [husband’s] retirement accounts.” Indeed, with respect to property settlements, “[p]ayments over a peri od of time are ordinarily favored, absent reasons warranting immediate payment.” Kennedy v. Kennedy , see Bollenbach v. Bollenbach , (ordering immediate payment of a property settlement because of a risk that
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 424 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 424 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-07 (Minn. Ct.App.1985).
Marriage of Huston v. Huston 412 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Huston v. Huston 412 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Cisek v. Cisek 409 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Cisek v. Cisek 409 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Petschel v. Petschel 406 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Petschel v. Petschel 406 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kennedy v. Kennedy 403 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kennedy v. Kennedy 403 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Tibbetts v. Tibbetts 398 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Tibbetts v. Tibbetts 398 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Davis v. Davis 394 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Davis v. Davis 394 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In making this determination, a trial court must consider the “financial resources of both parties.”
Marriage of Jorschumb v. Jorschumb 390 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Jorschumb v. Jorschumb 390 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
cautions that an award of property should not be determinative of custody.
Schuck v. Schuck 390 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schuck v. Schuck 390 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nash v. Nash 388 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nash v. Nash 388 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Speltz v. Speltz 386 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wende v. Wende 386 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Speltz v. Speltz 386 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wende v. Wende 386 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In making this determination, a trial court must consider the “financial resources of both parties.”
Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
§ 518.552 which signal a return to consideration of permanent maintenance as a -06 (Minn.Ct.App.1985).