DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Edmison, 379 N.W.2d 85.

42 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    State v. Edmison , n.1 (M inn.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    State v. Edmison , n.1 (Minn. 1985).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    The supreme court has stated that a collateral attack on the validity of a guilty plea will only be allowed in “unique cases.” State v. Warren , ().
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    And the “state has the burden of proof in establishing a defendant’s criminal history [score] for Sentencing Guidelines purposes.” n.1 (Minn. 1985).
  • State v. Strobel 921 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
  • State v. Strobel 921 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    State v. Edmison , , 87 & n.1 (Minn. 1985).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    State v. Edmison , n. 1 (Minn. 1985).
  • State v. Washington 894 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
  • State v. Washington 894 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    87 n.1 (Minn.1985) (noting that the “state has the burden of proof in establishing a defendant’s criminal history for Sentencing Guidelines purposes”) (citation omitted).
  • State v. McFee 721 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 2006
  • State v. McFee 721 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 2006
    We have limited collateral attack of underlying convictions sought to be used as sentencing enhancements to " 'unique cases.’ ” ().
  • State v. Fussy 467 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Fussy 467 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1991
    where we held that a conviction based on an uncounseled misdemeanor plea may not be used in computing a defendant’s criminal history score.
  • Caucus Distributors, Inc. v. Commissioner of Commerce 422 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Caucus Distributors, Inc. v. Commissioner of Commerce 422 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    reviewed and remanded on other grounds
  • State v. Warren 419 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Warren 419 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Goff 418 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Goff 418 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1988
    we held that “if a criminal defendant properly raises the issue, * * * then the sentencing court may not use a prior misdemeanor conviction in computing the presumptive sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for the current offense unless the state proves that the prior conviction was not obtained i
  • State v. Axford 409 N.W.2d 893 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Axford 409 N.W.2d 893 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    reviewed and remanded on other grounds
  • State v. Johnson 411 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Johnson 411 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Rubin 409 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Rubin 409 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1987
    the 7 convictions cannot be counted and that, therefore, his correct criminal history score should be 4 and the presumptive sentence should be 25 months.
  • State v. Larson 409 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Larson 409 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    at 905 ; (sentencing court may not use a prior misdemeanor conviction in computing a presumptive sentence if the prior conviction was obtained in violation of defendant's right to counsel).
  • State v. Warren 407 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Warren 407 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    The court extended the effect of such a
  • State v. Rubin 404 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Rubin 404 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    the Minnesota Supreme Court held that if the State wishes to use prior convictions based on guilty pleas in computing a defendant’s sentence, it must prove that the defendant was represented by counsel or that there was a valid waiver of the right to counsel on the record of each prior conviction.
  • State v. Goff 402 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Goff 402 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that a sentencing court may not consider prior misdemeanor convictions for current sentencing purposes unless the State proves that those convictions were not obtained in violation of defendant’s right to counsel.
  • State v. Cobb 403 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Cobb 403 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Campa 399 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Campa 399 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Campa 390 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Campa 390 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Larsen 384 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Larsen 384 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1986