Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jones, 392 N.W.2d 224.

295 citing documents.

White v. State 711 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2006
White v. State 711 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2006
State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
State v. Martin 695 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2005
State v. Martin 695 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2005
A reasonable probability is “ ‘a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’ ” (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct.
Zenanko v. State 688 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 2004
Zenanko v. State 688 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 2004
State v. Blom 682 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2004
State v. Blom 682 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2004
State v. Cham 680 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Cham 680 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Opsahl v. State 677 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2004
Jones v. State 671 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 2003
Jones v. State 671 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 2003
State v. Miller 666 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2003
State v. Miller 666 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2003
State v. Vick 632 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 2001
Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
Voorhees v. State 627 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2001
Voorhees v. State 627 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2001
State v. Rhodes 627 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 2001
State v. Rhodes 627 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 2001
State v. Gustafson 610 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2000
State v. Gustafson 610 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2000
“There is a strong presumption that a counsel’s performance falls within the wide range of ‘reasonable professional assistance.’ ”
State v. Voorhees 596 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1999
State v. Voorhees 596 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1999
Jihad v. State 594 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1999
Jihad v. State 594 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1999
We have previously stated that we give particular deference to decisions of counsel regarding trial strategy and that questions of "[w]hich witnesses to call at trial and what information to present to the jury are questions that lie within the proper discretion of the trial counsel.”
State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
State v. DeVerney 592 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1999
State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
State v. DeVerney 592 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1999
State v. Windish 590 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 1999
State v. Doppler 590 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1999
State v. Windish 590 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 1999
-20 (Minn.1989) (stating that good cause does not include calendar congestion unless exceptional circumstances exist).
State v. Doppler 590 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1999
State v. Brocks 587 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1998
State v. Brocks 587 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1998
There is a strong presumption that a counsel’s performance falls within the wide range of “reasonable professional assistance.”
State v. Lahue 585 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1998
State v. Lahue 585 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1998
Wilson v. State 582 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1998
Wilson v. State 582 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1998
State v. Folkers 581 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1998
State v. Folkers 581 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1998
State v. Patterson 577 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1998
State v. Patterson 577 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1998
that the government knows the truth.” In State v. Jones, a ease in which the prosecutor was permitted to inform the jury of plea agreements worked out with two accomplices in exchange for their truthful testimony, this court stated “[w]e have never held that plea negotiations granting favorable treatment to prosecution witnesses in return for truthful testimony are per se unconstitutional * ⅜ *.” (emphasis in original).
State v. Ives 568 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1997
State v. Ives 568 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1997
In regard to Ives’ claim that his attorney failed to adequately prepare for his trial, there is a strong presumption that an attorney’s representation falls within the wide range of “reasonable professional assistance.” Scruggs, d at 27 .