Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jones, 392 N.W.2d 224.

295 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Roxanne Kay DeFlorin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The delay in speedy-trial cases is calculated from the point at which the sixth amendment right attaches: when a formal indictment or information is issued against a person or when a person is arrested and held to answer a criminal charge.”
State of Minnesota v. Amir Abd El Malak Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, n.10 (Minn. 2012) (stating that “decisions about which witnesses to interview are typically matters of trial strategy that we will not review”); d 224, 236 (Minn. 1986) (stating that decisions about “[w]hich witnesses to call at trial and what information to present to the jury are questions that lie within the proper discretion of the trial counsel”).
State of Minnesota v. George Howland Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. George Howland Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Length of the Delay We calculate a speedy-trial delay “from the point at which the sixth amendment right attaches: when a formal indictment or information is issued against a person or 7 when a person is arrested and held to answer a criminal charge.”
State of Minnesota v. Gerard McNeal, and Gerard McNeal v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gerard McNeal, and Gerard McNeal v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Opsahl, d at 421 (“We are in no position to second-guess counsel’s decision to focus his strategy on other defenses instead of investigating [other] suspects.”); (finding that the extent of counsel’s investigation is considered a part of trial strategy).
Michael Frederick Schmidt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Michael Frederick Schmidt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
sion, “[counsel] informed him that an expert [was] available, but that the cost would be prohibitive” and that “[counsel] discouraged him from even attempting to secure funds from the court to help defray some of the costs of an expert.” These alleged statements by Schmidt’s trial counsel do not “concern errors in professional performance but instead relate to trial strategy.”
State of Minnesota v. Ron Wesley Epps Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ron Wesley Epps Minn. Ct. App. 2014
This right attaches “when a formal indictment or information is issued against a person or when a person is arrested and held to answer a criminal charge.”
State v. Bahtuoh 840 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2013
State v. Bahtuoh 840 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2013
See, (stating that “trial tactics should not be reviewed by an appellate court, which, unlike the counsel, has the benefit of hindsight”).
Dereje v. State 837 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 2013
State v. Nicks 831 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 2013
State v. Nicks 831 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 2013
We have rejected claims that trial counsel was ineffective for: failing to hire a private investigator, -37 (Minn.1986); failing to interview prospective witnesses, Id.; failing to call prospective witnesses, Scruggs, d at 26-27 ; and failing to pursue alternative-perpetrator theories, Opsahl, d at 421 .
State v. Davis 820 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 2012
State v. Davis 820 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 2012
State v. Beecroft 813 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2012
State v. Beecroft 813 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2012
State v. Rhoads 802 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Rhoads 802 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
5 (), review denied (Minn. Jul.
Francis v. State 781 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 2010
Francis v. State 781 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 2010
There is “a strong presumption that a counsel’s performance falls within the wide range of ‘reasonable professional assistance.’ ”
State v. Loving 775 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 2009
State v. Loving 775 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 2009
State v. Bobo 770 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 2009
State v. Bobo 770 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 2009
State v. Griffin 760 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Griffin 760 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Griffin aptly notes that “overcrowding in the court system is not a valid reason for denying a defendant a speedy trial.” Windish, d at 316 ().
State v. Williams 757 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Williams 757 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Although the responsibility for an overburdened judicial system cannot rest with the defendant, “when the overall delay in bringing a case to trial is the result of the defendant’s actions, there is no speedy trial violation.”
Jama v. State 756 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Jama v. State 756 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
A strong presumption exists “that a counsel’s performance falls within the wide range of ‘reasonable professional assistance.’ ”
State v. Miller 754 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2008
State v. Miller 754 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2008
“There is a strong presumption that a counsel’s performance falls within the wide range of ‘reasonable professional assistance.’ ” Fields, d at 468 ().
State v. Smith 749 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Smith 749 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(finding seven-month delay sufficient to trigger further analysis).
Cooper v. State 745 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 2008
Cooper v. State 745 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 2008
“There is a strong presumption that a counsel’s performance falls within the wide range of ‘reasonable professional assistance.’ ” Fields, d at 468 ().
Pippitt v. State 737 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 2007
Pippitt v. State 737 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 2007
Fields v. State 733 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 2007
Fields v. State 733 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 2007
“There is a strong presumption that a counsel’s performance falls within the wide range of ‘reasonable professional assistance.’ ” (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct.
State v. Cram 718 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 2006
State v. Cram 718 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 2006
A reasonable probability is “ ⅛ probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’ ” (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct.
Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
State v. Jackson 714 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 2006
State v. Barnes 713 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 2006
State v. Barnes 713 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 2006
“[Tjhere is a strong presumption that a counsels’ performance falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” ().