Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bias, 419 N.W.2d 480.

202 citing documents.

State v. Church 577 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1998
State v. Church 577 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1998
“[E]videnee of flight suggests consciousness of guilt.”
In Re the Welfare of S.A.M. 570 N.W.2d 162 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Welfare of S.A.M. 570 N.W.2d 162 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Ashby 567 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1997
State v. Ashby 567 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1997
State v. Walen 563 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1997
State v. Walen 563 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1997
State v. Dominguez-Ramirez 563 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1997
State v. Dominguez-Ramirez 563 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1997
State v. Coleman 560 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Coleman 560 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Wallace 558 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1997
State v. Wallace 558 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1997
Id.; (concluding that physical evidence of the struggle and other circumstantial evidence supported the conclusion that the defendant intended to kill his victim during a burglary)
State v. Jones 556 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1996
State v. Jones 556 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1996
The general standard of review when an appellant claims the evidence is insufficient to sustain his criminal conviction is “whether, under the facts in the record and any legitimate inferences that can be drawn from them, a jury could reasonably conclude the defendant was guilty of the offense charged.”
State v. Spaeth 552 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1996
State v. Spaeth 552 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1996
State v. Kissner 541 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Kissner 541 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Zanter 535 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1995
State v. Zanter 535 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1995
But, if a jury conviction is based solely on circumstantial evidence, “the circumstances proved must be consistent with the hypothesis that the defendant is guilty and inconsistent with any other rational hypothesis other than guilt.” ().
State v. Alt 529 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Alt 529 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Klosterboer 529 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Klosterboer 529 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(jury alone determines credibility of witnesses and resolves all conflicts in testimony).
Hoagland v. State 518 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 1994
Hoagland v. State 518 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 1994
In a direct appeal of a criminal conviction, this court “must determine, under the facts in the record and any legitimate inferences that can be drawn from those facts, whether a jury could reasonably conclude that defendant was guilty of the offense charged.”
State v. Jones 516 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1994
State v. Jones 516 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1994
State v. Steinbuch 514 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1994
State v. Steinbuch 514 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1994
State v. Williams 510 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Williams 510 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(conviction based on circumstantial evidence will be upheld if evidence is inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt).
State v. Trong Kim Huynh 504 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Trong Kim Huynh 504 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Combs 504 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Combs 504 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Day 501 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Day 501 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Scharmer 501 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1993
State v. Scharmer 501 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1993
State v. Blahowski 499 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Blahowski 499 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(appellate court must assume jury believed state’s witnesses and disbelieved contrary evidence).
State v. Jones 500 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Jones 500 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Maurer 488 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Maurer 488 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In re the Welfare of T.J.B. 488 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In re the Welfare of T.J.B. 488 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992