DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bias, 419 N.W.2d 480.

202 citing documents.

  • State v. Miller 488 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Miller 488 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1992
    “ ‘The evidence is entitled to the same weight as any evidence so long as the circumstances proved are consistent with the hypothesis that the accused is guilty and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt.’ ” Dewald, d at 748 ().
  • State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
    (evidence of defendant’s flight after crime suggests consciousness of guilt); (where defendant asserted self-defense, witness allowed to testify as to the actions of defendant during the fight); -20 (Minn.1978) (wher
  • State v. Bickham 485 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Bickham 485 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Moore 481 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Moore 481 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Brovold 477 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Brovold 477 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Shepherd 477 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Shepherd 477 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1991
  • State v. LaDoucer 477 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. LaDoucer 477 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Landin 472 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Landin 472 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1991
    Where, as here, a conviction is based on circumstantial evidence, the appropriate standard of review is whether “the circumstances form ‘a complete chain which, in light of the evidence as a whole, leads so directly to the guilt of the accused as to exclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, any reasonable inference other than that of guilt.’ ” ().
  • State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Jackson 469 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Jackson 469 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    (jury assesses credibility and was “fully apprised of discrepancies in the evidence”).
  • State v. Bright 471 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Bright 471 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Bauer 471 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Bauer 471 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Jinkerson 469 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Jinkerson 469 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Rasinski 464 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Rasinski 464 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    When reviewing an insufficiency of evidence claim, this court, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, “must determine whether, under the facts in the record and any legitimate inferences that can be drawn from them, a jury could reasonably conclude the defendant was guilty of the offense charged.” ().
  • State v. Lehikoinen 463 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Lehikoinen 463 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    In making this determination, the reviewing court must “assume the [trier of fact] believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contrary evidence.”
  • State v. DeWald 463 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1990
  • State v. DeWald 463 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Saybolt 461 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Saybolt 461 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    1068, 1071 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970); The standard of review on a claim for insufficient evidence in a
  • State v. Cichon 458 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Cichon 458 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    being at the house of *736 “Butch.” The jury, however, was “fully apprised of discrepancies in the evidence.”
  • State v. Lanam 459 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Lanam 459 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1990
    Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and assuming the jury believed the witnesses for the state and disbelieved any contrary evidence, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient.
  • McConnell v. City of Mankato 456 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • McConnell v. City of Mankato 456 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    (jury to determine credibility and weight to be given to testimony of witnesses).
  • State v. Mosby 450 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Mosby 450 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
  • Jackson v. State 447 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • Jackson v. State 447 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Watson 433 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Watson 433 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Hicks 432 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Hicks 432 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    the Minnesota Supreme Court discussed the general standard of review on a claim of insufficient evidence in a criminal case.