Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Sanger, 420 N.W.2d 241.

37 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. K. T., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
20, 1990), such as activating 6 emergency lights and using a squad car’s horn, - 43 (Minn. App. 1988); ordering a person out of their vehicle and “summoning ” them to provide identification and answer questions, Day, d at 407; pounding on a driver’s side window and opening their door, or using “a squad car to block a parked ve
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
10 citizen-to-citizen interaction, such as when the officer ceases to be “conversational” and instead becomes “overbearing and harassing.” (quotation omitted).
Nicholas Roger Marczak, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Safety , review denied (Minn. May 24, 1989); State v. Sanger
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
this court concluded that a police officer seized a person by using his squad car to completely prevent any movement by a car that was parked alongside a curb behind another parked car, activating his flashing red lights, and honking his horn.
David Kenneth Schlicher, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Brian Albert Lacey Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Brian Albert Lacey Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tony Luke Fisher Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tony Luke Fisher Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 241, 243-44 (Minn. App. 1988).
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Scott Welch Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Scott Welch Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding seizure occurs where officer parks squad car in position that prevents suspect from exiting).
State of Minnesota v. Sherman Peak Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Sherman Peak Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Safety, review denied (Minn. May 24, 1989); and that such a seizure is a proper investigatory detention if the investigating officers had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the suspect was engaged in criminal activity, Lopez, d at 23; Klotz, d at 665; Sanger, d at 244.
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Earl Westergaard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Earl Westergaard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Illi, 2015 WL 9264036 at *2 ().
Rita Dolores Illi v. Commissioner of Public Safety 873 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rita Dolores Illi v. Commissioner of Public Safety 873 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Leroy Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Leroy Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In support of the latter contention, in which this court concluded that a police officer lacked a reasonable, articulable suspicion to justify his seizure of a parked vehicle based on his “rather candid admission that he approached the car ‘to see what was going on.’” Id.
State of Minnesota v. Zachary Michael Staples Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Zachary Michael Staples Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Other such acts include “boxing the car in, [and] approaching it on all sides by many officers or use of flashing lights.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Paul Joseph Cunningham Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Paul Joseph Cunningham Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Lopez 698 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Lopez 698 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Safety, review denied (Minn. May 24, 1989)
State v. Bergerson 659 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Bergerson 659 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(holding that officer “boxing in [suspect’s] car, then activating his squad’s flashing red lights and honking his horn” created a seizure); -20 (Minn.1993) (concluding there was no seizure where officer, suspecting no criminal activity, activated flashing re
State v. Haataja 611 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Haataja 611 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
A brief investigatory stop of a person is lawful if the officer is able to articulate a “particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-18 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Hanson 501 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Hanson 501 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
where an officer observed a black Camaro parked at the curb in a residential area of Moorhead at 11:30 p.m.
Crawford v. Commissioner of Public Safety 441 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Crawford v. Commissioner of Public Safety 441 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Klotz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 437 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Klotz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 437 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
1870, 1877 , 64 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980)