DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Salitros, 499 N.W.2d 815.

215 citing documents.

  • State v. James 520 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 1994
    A prosecutor has the obligation “ ‘to guard the rights of the accused as well as to enforce the rights of the public.’ ” (quoting I ABA Standards for Criminal Justice, The Prosecution Function 3-1.1 and Commentary at 3.7 (2 ed.)).
  • State v. Thompson 520 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Thompson 520 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Starkey 516 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Starkey 516 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1994
    A prosecutor may not “seek convictions at any price.”
  • State v. Richardson 514 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Richardson 514 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Post 512 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Post 512 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1994
    -20 (Minn.1993), where we awarded a new trial to a criminal defendant because the prosecutor’s closing statement included a number of improper arguments, one of them similar to this argument.
  • State v. Hawkins 511 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Hawkins 511 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Starkey 507 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Starkey 507 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. VanWagner 504 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1993
  • State v. VanWagner 504 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1993
    (new trial granted prophylac-tically even though “it is at least arguable that the defense was not prejudiced by nondisclosure and that therefore a new trial is not required”); (guilty verdict reversed prophylactically, quoting Kaiser).