Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Cogshell, 538 N.W.2d 120.

27 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(upholding admission of Spreigl evidence when only similarities between prior and charged offenses were type of drug and packaging used by defendant).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Diamond Lee Jamal Griffin 887 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Richard Ellis Hill 871 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Richard Ellis Hill 871 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 2015
10 Hampshire, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 132 S. Ct. 716, 724 (2012); Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 198-200 (1972); (“Due process is violated by [a photo] display if the display was so unnecessarily suggestive as to create a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”).
State v. Montgomery 707 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Montgomery 707 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
To fit that provision, the Spreigl evidence must be “sufficiently or substantially similar to the charged offense — determined by time, place and modus operandi.” Kennedy, d at 391 (citing State v. Cógshell, -24 (Minn.1995)).
State v. Blom 682 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2004
State v. Blom 682 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2004
see, -15 (Minn.1990) (finding no abuse of discretion when the incidents all involved the use of a knife, the removal of clothes, and sexual threats).
Pierson v. State 637 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 2002
Pierson v. State 637 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 2002
State v. Vick 632 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 2001
State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
(holding that an offense committed 15 months earlier was “not closely related to the crime charged in temporal terms”).
State v. Profit 591 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1999
State v. Profit 591 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1999
State v. Lynch 590 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1999
State v. Lynch 590 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1999
State v. Kennedy 585 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1998
State v. Kennedy 585 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1998
State v. Shannon 583 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 1998
State v. Shannon 583 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 1998
State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997
State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997
State v. Lewis 547 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1996
State v. Lewis 547 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1996
Relevant recent decisions of this court setting forth in detail the settled case law controlling the admission of other-crime or so-called Spreigl 1