Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co., 537 N.W.2d 271.

90 citing documents.

Orono Oaks Volunteer Road Association, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Charles A. Laliberte, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co., (citing Charboneau v. Am.
A18-0707 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 899 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 2017
Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 899 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 2017
State v. Garcia-Gutierrez 844 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 2014
State v. Garcia-Gutierrez 844 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 2014
Co., see also State v. Moseng, 254 Minn. 263, 269 , -12 (1959) (noting that when a question of statutory construction involves a failure of expression rather than an ambiguity of expression, we “are not free to substitute amendment for construction and thereby supply the omissions of the le
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of J.J.P. 831 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 2013
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
Co., (declining to read into a statute “restrictions or guidelines that the legislature has not included”).
KRUMMENACHER v. City of Minnetonka 783 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2010
KRUMMENACHER v. City of Minnetonka 783 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2010
Co., (“Where the intention of the legislature is clearly manifested by plain unambiguous language ...
Brayton v. Pawlenty 781 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 2010
Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe 776 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 2009
Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe 776 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 2009
Co., (“Where the intention of the legislature is clearly manifested by plain unambiguous language ...
In Re the Estate of Jotham 722 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 2006
In Re the Disposition of Molly 712 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Disposition of Molly 712 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Co., (citation omitted).
Wenigar v. Johnson 712 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Civil Commitment of Stone 711 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Civil Commitment of Stone 711 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Co., (stating that, when language of statute is plain, court should not construct statute to include words that were omitted).
Wenigar v. Johnson 712 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Tezak v. Bachke 698 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Tezak v. Bachke 698 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co., (noting that compensatory damages are generally synonymous with actual damages, but damages may be multiplied when statute provides for multiplication of actual damages to arrive at compensatory damages).
Willhite v. Cass County Board of Supervisors 692 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Willhite v. Cass County Board of Supervisors 692 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 2004
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 2004
Hinckley v. School Board of Independent School District No. 2167 678 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Hinckley v. School Board of Independent School District No. 2167 678 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Rowe v. Munye 674 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Rowe v. Munye 674 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co., , 275 n. 2 (Minn.1995) (defining general damages as “the natural, necessary and usual result of the wrongful act or occurrence in question”) (emphasis added).
State v. Harris 667 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 2003
State v. Harris 667 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 2003
Co., (declining to read into statute restrictions that the legislature did not include).
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 664 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 664 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Robert W. Carlstrom Co. v. German Evangelical Lutheran St. Paul's Congregation of the Unaltered Augsburg Confession at Jordan 662 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Robert W. Carlstrom Co. v. German Evangelical Lutheran St. Paul's Congregation of the Unaltered Augsburg Confession at Jordan 662 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Heidbreder v. Carton 636 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A. 636 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A. 636 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Heidbreder v. Carton 636 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., (stating “[w]here the intention of the legislature is clearly manifested by plain unambiguous language * * * no construction is necessary”).
Pususta v. State Farm Insurance Companies 632 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 2001
Pususta v. State Farm Insurance Companies 632 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 2001
Co., , 275 n. 2 (Minn.1995) (stating compensatory damages are the “natural, necessary and usual result of the * * * occurrence in question.”); (stating aggravation damages ensure that defendant pays only for the harm he causes, not the harm plaintiff already had); Nelson
Kipp v. Sweno 629 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Kipp v. Sweno 629 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSG 622 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 2001
Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSG 622 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 2001