Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co., 537 N.W.2d 271.

90 citing documents.

Paidar v. Hughes 615 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2000
Paidar v. Hughes 615 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2000
Co., , 275 n. 2 (Minn.1995) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 390 (6th ed.)).
Jensen v. Walsh 609 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Jensen v. Walsh 609 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, Vin 2MEBP95F9CX644211 License No. MN 225 NSG 609 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, Vin 2MEBP95F9CX644211 License No. MN 225 NSG 609 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(prohibiting statutory construction where legislative intent is manifested in plain unambiguous language).
LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., (stating “[w]here the intention of the legislature is clearly manifested by plain unambiguous language * * * no construction [of the statute] is necessary or permitted”).
State v. Uber 604 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Uber 604 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
EMC Insurance Companies v. Dvorak 603 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
EMC Insurance Companies v. Dvorak 603 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Holiday Recreational Industries, Inc. v. Manheim Services Corp. 599 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Holiday Recreational Industries, Inc. v. Manheim Services Corp. 599 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., (reviewing doubling of damages); Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Eng’g Co., (attorney fees).
State v. Lucas 589 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1999
State v. Lucas 589 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1999
Kohn v. City of Minneapolis Fire Department 583 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Kohn v. City of Minneapolis Fire Department 583 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Klein Bancorporation, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 581 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Klein Bancorporation, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 581 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Co., (holding where intention of legislature clearly manifested by plain unambiguous language, no construction necessary or permitted).
Matter of Welfare of JM 574 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1998
Matter of Welfare of JM 574 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1998
Wynkoop v. Carpenter 574 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1998
Wynkoop v. Carpenter 574 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1998
Tracy State Bank v. Tracy-Garvin Cooperative 573 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Tracy State Bank v. Tracy-Garvin Cooperative 573 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
No. 112, (holding where intention of legislature clearly manifested by plain unambiguous language, no construction necessary or permit *396 ted).
Petition of Anderson 565 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Petition of Anderson 565 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(holding that “where the intention of the legislature is clearly manifested by plain unambiguous language * * * no construction is necessary or permitted”).
State Ex Rel. Schaller v. County of Blue Earth 563 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
Meyer v. Best Western Seville Plaza Hotel 562 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Meyer v. Best Western Seville Plaza Hotel 562 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co., (citing Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed Dish, 278 Minn. 1, 9 , ); Minn.Stat.
State v. Orsello 554 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1996
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Joel v. Wellman 551 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Joel v. Wellman 551 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
A statute is ambiguous only if “susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation.”
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Hamline-Midway Neighborhood Stability Coalition v. City of St. Paul 547 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Hamline-Midway Neighborhood Stability Coalition v. City of St. Paul 547 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
A statute is ambiguous only if it is “susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation.”
State v. Sebasky 547 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Sebasky 547 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., (refusing to consider legislative history when the legislature’s intent is clearly manifested by unambiguous language); (giving effect to the plain meaning of a statute when its language is clear and unambiguous); W.H.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by