Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 525 N.W.2d 592.

24 citing documents.

James F. Christie, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Estate of: Mathew Joseph Tomczik, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Airlines, Inc., (concluding that questions of law are reviewed de novo).
Ramsey County Attorney, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Pohocogo, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Airlines, Inc., (stating that an appellate court is required to give deference and due regard to the district court’s credibility determinations).
State v. HA 716 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. H.A. 716 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. H.A. 716 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
State v. HA 716 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
State v. Schultz 676 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Schultz 676 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
Independent School District No. 404 v. Castor 670 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Independent School District No. 404 v. Castor 670 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“Generally on appeal from a judgment where no motion for a new trial was made, the only questions for review are whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such findings sustain the conclusions of law and the judgment.” Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Schroeder v. White 624 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Schroeder v. White 624 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
Karels v. State Farm Insurance Co. 617 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Karels v. State Farm Insurance Co. 617 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., (“Generally on appeal from a judgment where no motion for a new trial was made, ‘the only questions for review are whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such findings sustain the conclusions of law and judgment.’ ”) (quoting Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N
Johns v. Harborage I, Ltd. 585 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Johns v. Harborage I, Ltd. 585 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
Marriage of Schubel v. Schubel 584 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Schubel v. Schubel 584 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., (appellate courts give due regard to the trial court’s credibility assessment); Minn. R. Civ.
Phong Thi Doan v. Medtronic, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Phong Thi Doan v. Medtronic, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
ANALYSIS I. When a party appeals from a judgment without having made a motion for a new trial, “the only questions for review are whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such findings sustain the conclusions of law and the judgment.” Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., (quoting Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , ).
Gergen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 548 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Gergen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 548 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
A finding of fact is clearly erroneous “ ‘only if, upon review of the entire evidence, a reviewing court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.’ ” Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., ().