Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M., 560 N.W.2d 687.

215 citing documents.

Ryan John Nordell v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Logan Nicholas Clay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Melissa Jill Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Logan Nicholas Clay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Melissa Jill Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The information necessary to support an investigative stop need not be based on the officer’s personal observations, rather, the police can base an investigative stop on an informant’s tip if it has sufficient indicia of reliability.”
State of Minnesota v. Roger Earl Holland 865 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Roger Earl Holland 865 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2015
(citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Lamont Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Lamont Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Police may rely on a confidential informant’s tip to conclude that probable cause exists, “if the tip has sufficient indicia of reliability.” (), review denied (Minn. July 25, 2000).
Matthew Allan White v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Matthew Allan White v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Reasonable, articulable suspicion exists “when an officer observes unusual conduct that leads the officer to reasonably conclude in light of his or her experience that criminal activity may be afoot.”
State of Minnesota v. Garry Leroy Gehrke Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Mikal Leritz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Mikal Leritz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Garry Leroy Gehrke Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Troy Erik Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Troy Erik Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
3 “The information necessary to support an investigative stop need not be based on the officer’s personal observations, rather, the police can base an investigative stop on an informant’s tip if it has sufficient indicia of reliability.”
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Gary Mason Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Adam Alvarado Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ashley Shayia Lee, (A14-1503), State of Minnesota v. Tasheanna Yvonne Moore, (A14-1504). Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Gary Mason Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Here, the district court instructed the jury to determine whether the objective facts would “support an officer’s reasonable belie[f] that Mr. Mason was driving.” Probable cause, in addition to being defined as an “honest and strong suspicion,” has also at times been stated in terms of an officer’s “reasonable belief.” See, (noting that probable cause requires police to have a “reasonable belief”).
State of Minnesota v. Ashley Shayia Lee, (A14-1503), State of Minnesota v. Tasheanna Yvonne Moore, (A14-1504). Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Adam Alvarado Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Del Roy Lloyd Wendt, III v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Del Roy Lloyd Wendt, III v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Safety, (), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. David Ford McMurray 860 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Deandre Dynell Burges Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Deandre Dynell Burges Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“We review de novo a district court’s ruling on constitutional questions involving searches and seizures.”); (stating the standard for reviewing district court’s reasonable-suspicion determination for Terry stops and probable-cause determination for warrantless searches is de novo).
State of Minnesota v. Sharleen Leslie Paulson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Sharleen Leslie Paulson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We review de novo a district court’s “determination of reasonable suspicion as it relates to Terry stops.” (footnote omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Chris William Savage Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Chris William Savage Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See In re Welfare of G. (NMN) M., d 54, 57 (Minn. App. 1996) (“[T]he grounds for making [an investigative] stop can be based on the collective knowledge of all investigating officers.”), aff’d
State of Minnesota v. Yee Leng Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Yee Leng Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
8 Probable cause “exists when the ‘objective facts are such that under the circumstances, a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.’” ().
State of Minnesota v. Dana James McEachern Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Brittney Dominique McKinney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dana James McEachern Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Brittney Dominique McKinney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
n.2 (Minn. 2014) (applying collective-knowledge doctrine on review of legality of pat search); (applying collective-knowledge doctrine on review of legality of emergency-aid search of residence); State v.
State of Minnesota v. Zacarias Lopez Sarmiento Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Zacarias Lopez Sarmiento Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(explaining the standard for probable cause to arrest where officers did not have a warrant to arrest).
State of Minnesota v. Shawnti Tramayne Fleming Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Shawnti Tramayne Fleming Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. James Irving Dale Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. James Irving Dale Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Reasonable, articulable suspicion exists “when an officer observes unusual conduct that leads the officer to reasonably conclude in light of his or her experience that criminal activity may be afoot.” d 687, 691 (Minn. 1997).
State of Minnesota v. Ronaldo Earl Rounds Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ronaldo Earl Rounds Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Neil Douglas Rollins v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Neil Douglas Rollins v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See In re Welfare of G. (NMN) M., 5 (Minn. App. 1996) (“[T]he grounds for making [an investigative] stop can be based on the collective knowledge of all investigating officers.”), aff’d