Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Senty-Haugen, 583 N.W.2d 266.

60 citing documents.

In Re Kindschy 634 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(holding that person subject to commitment as sexually dangerous person or sexual psychopathic personality had no statutory right to receive treatment from least-restrictive alternative program).
Marriage of Krech v. Krech 624 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Krech v. Krech 624 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Hince v. O'KEEFE 613 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hince v. O'KEEFE 613 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A. 594 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A. 594 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(citing de novo standard of review for questions of statutory interpretation).
Joelson v. O'KEEFE 594 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Erickson 589 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1999
State v. Erickson 589 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1999
269 n. 3 (Minn.1998) (“It is well-settled law that courts should not reach constitutional issues if matters can be resolved otherwise.”).