Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jones, 566 N.W.2d 317.

41 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Adam Alan Penhollow Minn. Ct. App. 2026
rev. denied (Minn. July 15, 2003).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(explaining that police statements that they had influence with the county attorney “were not the kind of statements that would make an innocent man confess”); (reasoning that confession was voluntary where the defendant was led to believe surveillance video of crime existed, but police did not inform defendant after police discovered no video existed).
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
rev. denied (Minn. July 15, 2003).
State of Minnesota v. Randall Thomas Graham Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Randall Thomas Graham Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. July 15, 2003).
State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee West Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee West Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The test of voluntariness is whether the actions of the police, together with other circumstances surrounding the interrogation were so coercive, so manipulative, so overpowering that [the defendant] was deprived of his ability to make an unconstrained and wholly autonomous decision to speak as he did.” 9 (Minn. 1997) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Deon Sinkfield, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Deon Sinkfield, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
at 475, 86 S. Ct. at 5 1628; see also Scott, d at 417; (“Waiver is defined as an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.”) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Stephanie Evon Glover Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Stephanie Evon Glover Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dana James McEachern Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dana James McEachern Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Hunter 857 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“Under the clearly erroneous standard, we shall give due regard to the [district] court’s ability to ascertain the credibility of witnesses.”).
State v. Beecroft 813 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2012
State v. Beecroft 813 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2012
at 492-93 (-23 (Minn.1997)).
State v. Thompson 788 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 2010
State v. Thompson 788 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 2010
However, we will make an independent determination of whether a suspect was in custody, whether the State has shown by a fair preponderance of the evidence that a defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his rights, and whether a statement was given voluntarily
State v. Fardan 773 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2009
State v. Jackson 770 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
State v. Jackson 770 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
(stating that the use of false information does not make a confession inadmissible, but instead the court looks for deceit of the kind that would make an innocent person confess).
State v. Ganpat 732 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 2007
State v. Ganpat 732 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 2007
(citing Colorado v. Connelly, *239 479 U.S. 157, 163-67 , 107 S.Ct.
State v. Burrell 697 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 2005
State v. Burrell 697 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 2005
-21, 324-25 (Minn.1997).
Bernhardt v. State 684 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 2004
Bernhardt v. State 684 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 2004
(noting that police officers falsely told defendant that a surveillance tape recorded his illegal actions when in fact no such tape existed, and that when police officers realized their mistake they did not inform defendant); (holding that the use of
In Re the Welfare of M.A.K. 667 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Welfare of M.A.K. 667 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Welfare of D.B.X. 638 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Welfare of D.B.X. 638 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
“[T]he determination whether a juvenile’s waiver of his or her rights is knowing, intelligent and voluntary is a fact question dependent upon the totality of the circumstances.” (citation omitted).
State v. Risk 598 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1999
State v. Risk 598 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1999
State v. Tibiatowski 590 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1999
State v. Tibiatowski 590 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1999
1682 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980)
State v. Scott 584 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1998
State v. Scott 584 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1998
(citing Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 163-67 , 107 S.Ct.
State v. Hough 571 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Hough 571 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Miller 573 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1998
State v. Miller 573 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1998
2350, 2356-57 , 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994)