DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Britton, 604 N.W.2d 84.

222 citing documents.

  • State v. Mahr 701 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Mahr 701 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Anderson 671 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Anderson 671 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    “In reviewing a district court’s determinations of the legality of a limited investigatory stop, we review questions of reasonable suspicion de novo.”
  • State v. Larsen 650 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2002
  • State v. Larsen 650 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2002
    See, (holding fact that vehicle had broken window was insufficient to support trial court conclusion that officer had a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity justifying investigative stop); (finding officer's stop of vehicle thought to be dr
  • State v. Vereb 643 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Vereb 643 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    On issues involving the legality of a limited investigatory stop, an appellate court reviews the district court’s determination of reasonable suspicion de novo and its findings of fact for “clear error.”
  • State v. Wagner 637 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Wagner 637 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Police may conduct limited stops to investigate suspected criminal activity when the police can “point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 , 88 S.Ct.
  • Gerding v. Commissioner of Public Safety 628 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Gerding v. Commissioner of Public Safety 628 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    “In reviewing a district court’s determinations of the legality of a limited investigatory stop, we review questions of reasonable suspicion de novo.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Schrupp 625 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Schrupp 625 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Victorsen 627 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Victorsen 627 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Schuster v. Commissioner of Public Safety 622 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Schuster v. Commissioner of Public Safety 622 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Anderson 620 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Anderson 620 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • Knapp v. Commissioner of Public Safety 610 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 2000
  • Knapp v. Commissioner of Public Safety 610 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 2000
    A stop is lawful if it is “based on a reasonable and articulable suspicion of ongoing criminal activity.”