Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dixon v. Depositors Insurance Co., 619 N.W.2d 752.

16 citing documents.

In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co. , (reviewing a district court’s decision to apply res judicata for abuse of discretion) .
A24-1031 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., (concluding judgment was final and res judicata applied because the appellant failed to “properly appeal” and reasoning that “[a]n order or judgment becomes final after the appellate process is terminated or the time for appeal has expired” (quotation omitted)).
A20-0501 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Philip Carlson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Estate of: Deanna Marie Heuer, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co. , (noting that, in some situations, a district court may decline to apply res judicata despite the presence of all four elements).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. T. and T. Z., Sr., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
James Vernon Larsen, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Maria Olson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Donald Sealock, derivatively on behalf of St. Michael Mall, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re: Estate of Loretta M. Chisholm, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co., d 752, 755 (Minn. App. 2000) (stating the district court’s decision to apply res judicata, once it is determined to be available, is reviewed for abuse of discretion).
State v. N.G.K. 770 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. NGK 770 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. N.G.K. 770 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Co., -56 (Minn.App.2000); State Farm Mut.
State v. NGK 770 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Co., -56 (Minn.App.2000); State Farm Mut.
Witzke v. Mesabi Rehabilitation Services, Inc. 768 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Witzke v. Mesabi Rehabilitation Services, Inc. 768 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Co., (describing summary judgment as “an integral part of civil procedure, ...