Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Soine, 348 N.W.2d 824.

23 citing documents.

Shawn Patrick Agar, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
5 (Minn. App. 1984) (describing appellant who shook a buck knife “about six or seven inches from [victim’s] face and chest”), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
26, 1985); (victim broke bottle and threatened defendant), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
16, 1988); (affirming defendant is convicted of second-degree assault because he brandished a knife “within striking distance” of his victim), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
16, 1988) review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(concluding that defendant intended to 11 cause fear when he waved knife near victim’s face), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
to stay back.” See State v. Soine , (affirming the defendant’s conviction of second-degree assault against a bysta nder because the defendant’s brandishing of a knife at the bystander and telling the bystander “to shut up” or “I’ll use it on you,” was intended to cause the bystander fear of immediate bodily harm), review deni
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(affirming second- degree assault conviction where defendant was holding a knife “within striking distance” while threatening an individual).
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
16, 1988); d 572, 574 (Minn. App. 1987) (defendant brandished knife in a manner that the jury could have found that it was used as a dangerous weapon to cause fear in another of immediate bodily harm); (defendant brandished a knife “within striking distance” of his victim), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Devon Scott Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Devon Scott Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
16, 1988); (affirming finding of intent where defendant brandished buck knife and testimony indicated he held it one or two feet from victim); (affirming intent to cause fear where defendant, standing several feet from victim, wielded and threatened to use a knife while in striking distance of victim), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Welfare of T.N.Y. 632 N.W.2d 765 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In the Welfare of T.N.Y. 632 N.W.2d 765 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
16, 1988); (affirming defendant is convicted of second-degree assault because he brandished a knife “within striking distance” of his victim), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Hough 571 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Hough 571 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Kastner 429 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Kastner 429 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
in which this court stated that Soine could be found guilty of second degree assault since he brandished a knife “within striking distance” of his victim.
State v. Patton 414 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Patton 414 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(evidence sufficient where jury could have reasonably concluded defendant caused puncture wound with a knife); (evidence sufficient where jury could find defendant held knife in his hand when he threatened victim).
State v. Cabrales 392 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Cabrales 392 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1986