Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stout v. AMCO Insurance Co., 645 N.W.2d 108.

24 citing documents.

Nichols v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 927 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Nichols v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 927 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , , 113 (Minn. 2002).
Nancy Bach, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Western National Insurance Co. v. Nguyen 902 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Western National Insurance Co. v. Nguyen 902 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Pamela Sue Platz, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, … 889 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2017
Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, … 889 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2017
Co., see also Lennartson, d at 530 (“Our analysis of ‘loss’ in Stout applies to the language of the No-Fault Act; it is not limited to the specific facts of that case.”).
Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, … 878 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, … 878 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
We determined in Stout v. AMCO Insurance Co. that an injured person “incurs” medical expenses under the No-Fault Act “as he or she receives bills for medical treatment.”
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (A14-132), (A14-224) v. Angela Mary Lennartson, (A14-132), Katie Foss, (A14-224). 857 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (A14-132), (A14-224) v. Angela Mary Lennartson, (A14-132), Katie Foss, (A14-224). 857 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Co., (finding that an insured’s “loss” under the no-fault act accrues when medical expenses are incurred and discounts later negotiated with medical providers do not change the amount incurred); Wallace v. Tri-State Ins.
Swanson v. Brewster 784 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2010
Swanson v. Brewster 784 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2010
Negotiated Discounts in the Context of the No-Fault Statute While we have not yet addressed the issue of a negotiated discount in the context of the collateral-source statute
Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 779 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 2010
Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 779 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 2010
Co., (holding that a no-fault insurer cannot reduce the amount of no-fault benefits payable to an injured person when the injured person’s health insurer pays the medical bills at a discounted rate).
Foust v. McFairland 698 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Foust v. McFairland 698 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Tezak v. Bachke 698 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Tezak v. Bachke 698 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
American Family Insurance Group v. Kiess 680 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
American Family Insurance Group v. Kiess 680 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co., the supreme court considered and rejected a nearly identical argument, holding that a no-fault insurer may not “attempt^ to reduce its obligation to provide basic economic loss benefits on the ground that another source of benefits has stepped in and decreased the amount of the injured person’s medic