Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Houston, 654 N.W.2d 727.

25 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
12 the vicinity’s history of drug activity, and the officer’s personal experience seizing guns from the building defendant exited); -34 (Minn. App. 2003) (concluding officers had reasonable suspicion to stop an individual when officers were in a high-crime area, investigating a possible gunshot, and the individual reacted to police nervously and evasively); WL 4528895, at *4 (Minn. App. July 6, 2015) (conc
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(holding that defendant was entitled t o a jury instruction on “fleeting control” under the particular facts of the case), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
at 318-319 (citing State v. Houston , review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-82 (Minn. 1993); -32 (Minn. App. 2003), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
eizure only with additional evidence of criminal activity.” Although there are cases in which seizures were determined to be lawful based on evasive conduct combined with other evidence of criminal activity , see, e.g., Wardlow, 528 U.S. at 124-25, 120 S. Ct. at 676 (assessing flight in the context of police convergence on an area known for heavy narcotics trafficking); State v. Houston , -34 (Minn. App. 2003) (assessing flight in the context of possible gunfire), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In State v. Houston, this court recognized that “[h]eadlong flight—wherever it occurs—is the consummate act of evasion: It is not necessarily ind icative of wrongdoing, but it is certainly suggestive of such.” (quoting Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 12 4, 120 S. Ct. 673, 676 (2000)), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Dennis Bernard Freeman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Dennis Bernard Freeman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Although Minnesota has rejected a fleeting-control exception to the crime of illegal possession of a firearm, -19 (Minn. App. 2008) (), Minnesota has neither adopted nor rejected a fleeting control defense to a drug possession case.
State of Minnesota v. Tony Luke Fisher Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tony Luke Fisher Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-32 (Minn. App. 2003), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Nasson Chaney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Nasson Chaney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Even if an error at trial, standing alone, would not be sufficient to require reversal, the cumulative effect of the errors may compel reversal.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Bradley James Richards Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Leonard Bowman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Leonard Bowman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Furthermore, this court has observed the United States Supreme Court’s recognition “‘that nervous, evasive behavior is a pertinent factor in determining reasonable suspicion.’” (quoting Wardlow, 528 U.S. at 124, 120 S. Ct. at 676), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Bradley James Richards Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Saaundre Julian Burns Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Saaundre Julian Burns Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Frederick Anthony Douglas Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Frederick Anthony Douglas Minn. Ct. App. 2014
d 727, 734 (Minn. App. 2003).
In Re the Welfare of S.J.J. 755 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Welfare of S.J.J. 755 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Whittle 685 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Whittle 685 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-36 (Minn.App.2003), review denied (Minn. Mar.