Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Auge v. Auge, 334 N.W.2d 393.

147 citing documents.

Marriage of Sefkow v. Sefkow 413 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(party opposing motion to remove must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the move is not in the best interests of the child); Minn.Stat.
Marriage of Splinter v. Landsteiner 414 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Splinter v. Landsteiner 414 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Imdieke v. Imdieke 411 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Imdieke v. Imdieke 411 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Eckman v. Eckman 410 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Eckman v. Eckman 410 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(court’s findings in custody adjudication should include consideration of relationships between the child and each parent, and the child’s preference, where appropriate).
Marriage of Berc v. Berc 407 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Berc v. Berc 407 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Respondent (age 39) is the former Carol Ann Auge (
Marriage of Lees v. Lees 404 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lees v. Lees 404 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Custody of N.M.O. 399 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Custody of N.M.O. 399 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(denial of custodial parent’s request to remove child from state was in fact a modification of custody and therefore an evidentiary hearing was required if non-custodial parent makes prima facie showing against removal); (evidentiary hear
Marriage of Haasken v. Haasken 396 N.W.2d 253 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Haasken v. Haasken 396 N.W.2d 253 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Greenlaw v. Greenlaw 396 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Greenlaw v. Greenlaw 396 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
396 n. 3 (Minn.1983); High v. High, 297 Minn. 512, 513
Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 393 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 393 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Upon granting a motion to remove a child, the trial court may adjust child support “to spread the cost of visitation in an equitable manner.”
Stein v. Timmons 392 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Stein v. Timmons 392 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
3 “simply because the move may require an adjustment in the existing pattern of visitation.”
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 391 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 391 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1986
§ 260.221(b)(7)); (modification of custody); (visitation rights); (removing child from state); (voluntary termination of parental rights); State ex.
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 390 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 390 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1986
See, (marital dissolution custody determinations); (modification of child custody award); (visitation rights); (custodial parent removing child from state); State ex rel.
Marriage of Lucas v. Lucas 389 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Lucas v. Lucas 389 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Sydnes v. Sydnes 388 N.W.2d 3 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Sydnes v. Sydnes 388 N.W.2d 3 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Vogt v. Vogt 385 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Vogt v. Vogt 385 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ryan v. Ryan 383 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ryan v. Ryan 383 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Bredeson v. Bredeson 380 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Bredeson v. Bredeson 380 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the supreme court indicated that support may be adjusted to provide for the expenses of visitation.
Marriage of Downey v. Zwigart 378 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Downey v. Zwigart 378 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ozenna v. Parmelee 377 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ozenna v. Parmelee 377 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Kennedy v. Kennedy 376 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sefkow v. Sefkow 372 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sefkow v. Sefkow 372 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Morey v. Peppin 375 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1985
Morey v. Peppin 375 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1985
Marriage of Otava v. Otava 374 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Tran Thi Ngoc Johnson v. Smith 374 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Stewart v. Stewart 373 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Stewart v. Stewart 373 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
the Minnesota Supreme Court remanded the case for a full hearing on the custodial parent’s request to remove the child from the state from November to June of each year.
Marriage of Otava v. Otava 374 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Tran Thi Ngoc Johnson v. Smith 374 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1985