Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Auge v. Auge, 334 N.W.2d 393.

147 citing documents.

Marriage of Kellen v. Kellen 367 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Kellen v. Kellen 367 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
supports Connie’s claim that costs of visitation are directly linked to terms of child support: When removal [of a child out of state] is permitted, the court shall make such modifications of visitation as are reasonable and necessary to maintain a good relationship between the noncustodial parent and chil
Marriage of Taflin v. Taflin 366 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Corwin v. Corwin 366 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Corwin v. Corwin 366 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Taflin v. Taflin 366 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 363 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 363 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Murray v. Antell 361 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Murray v. Antell 361 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Madgett v. Madgett 360 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Madgett v. Madgett 360 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Adam v. Adam 358 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Adam v. Adam 358 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
According to Diane’s counsel, the purpose of the continuance was to allow time for preparation of an affidavit making a prima facie case against removal, to compel an evidentiary hearing.
Marriage of Clark v. Clark 358 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Clark v. Clark 358 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
1 The Minnesota Supreme Court has stated a trial court may not modify a custody award “absent an evidentiary hearing in which witnesses may be cross-examined.”
Marriage of Rinker v. Rinker 358 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Rinker v. Rinker 358 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Gunderson, d at 548 , -99 (Minn.1983).
Toro Co. v. Commissioner of Economic SEC. 356 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of ELH 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of ELH 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Gordon v. Gordon 356 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Gordon v. Gordon 356 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
the court stated that child support may be modified to equitably spread visitation expenses, provided the best interests of the children are con *438 sidered.
Marriage of Stangel v. Stangel 355 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Stangel v. Stangel 355 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Then it considered the proposed move, presuming, that a request by the custodial parent to move the child to another state was in the best interests of the child.
Marriage of Hegerle v. Hegerle 355 N.W.2d 726 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Hegerle v. Hegerle 355 N.W.2d 726 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
the Minnesota Supreme Court discussed the right to an evidentiary hearing where a custodial parent petitions the court for permission to move a child to another state.
Marriage of Sumner v. Sumner 353 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Sumner v. Sumner 353 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Morey v. Peppin 353 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Morey v. Peppin 353 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Chapman v. Chapman 352 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Chapman v. Chapman 352 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Tieso v. Hansen 349 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Tieso v. Hansen 349 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
On June 7, 1983, the Supreme Court issued an order of remand requiring a
Shepard v. Shepard 352 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Shepard v. Shepard 352 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Meyer v. Meyer 346 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Meyer v. Meyer 346 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Benson v. Benson 346 N.W.2d 196 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Benson v. Benson 346 N.W.2d 196 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
because Philip failed to present a prima facie case against removal.
In Re the Marriage of Gottenborg 343 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage of Gottenborg 343 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
High v. High, 297 Minn. 512
Marriage of Gordon v. Gordon 339 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1983
Marriage of Gordon v. Gordon 339 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1983
On June 3, 1983, in which we held that a motion by the custodial parent to permit removal to another state shall be granted unless the party opposing the motion establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the move is not in the best interests of the child.
State on Behalf of Gunderson v. Preuss 336 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1983
State on Behalf of Gunderson v. Preuss 336 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1983
(quoting from D’Onofrio v. D’Onofrio, 144 N.J.Super.