Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Heddan v. Dirkswager, 336 N.W.2d 54.

90 citing documents.

Royce James Stute, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Jesse M. Gregorich, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Joseph Lawrence Weber, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-63 (Minn. 1983); see also Hamilton v. Comm’r of Pub.
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2020
6; (holding pre hearing license revocations constitutional, with an emphasis on the availability of prompt post-revocation hearings).
Patrick Jerald Martini, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Anderson 931 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Anderson 931 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Heddan v. Dirkswager , , 63 (Minn. 1983).
Bedeau v. Evans 926 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bedeau v. Evans 926 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bedeau argues that she never had a meaningful opportunity to contest the predatory charge against her, as that charge was dismissed, citing Heddan v. Dirkswager , , 59 (Minn. 1983) ("The fundamental requirement of due process is the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner."
Olson v. One 1999 Lexus Mn License Plate No. 851ldv Vin: Jt6hf10u6x0079461 924 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2019
Olson v. One 1999 Lexus Mn License Plate No. 851ldv Vin: Jt6hf10u6x0079461 924 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2019
Heddan v. Dirkswager , , 60 (Minn. 1983) (citing Montrym , 443 U.S. at 11 -12 , 99 S.Ct.
Olson v. JT6HF10u6X0079461 910 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Olson v. JT6HF10u6X0079461 910 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Heddan v. Dirkswager , , 60 (Minn. 1983) (citing Mackey v. Montrym , 443 U.S. 1 , 11-12, 99 S.Ct.
State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr. 859 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr. 859 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 2015
Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety 848 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2014
Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety 848 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2014
(“[D]runken drivers pose a severe threat to the health and safety of the citizens of Minnesota.”).
Williams v. Commissioner of Public Safety 830 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Williams v. Commissioner of Public Safety 830 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
The Minnesota Supreme Court has identified three factors affecting the actual weight given to private interest: “(1) the duration of the revocation; (2) the availability of hardship relief; and (3) the availability of prompt post-revocation review.” (citing Mackey, .
Heino v. One 2003 Cadillac, MN License No. KFR615, VIN: 1G6KS54Y83U131208 762 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Heino v. One 2003 Cadillac, MN License No. KFR615, VIN: 1G6KS54Y83U131208 762 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Wiltgen 737 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 2007
State v. Wiltgen 737 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 2007
Safety, -05 (Minn. 1994)
Johnson v. Fabian 735 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 2007
Johnson v. Fabian 735 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 2007
Bendorf v. Commissioner of Public Safety 727 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 2007
Bendorf v. Commissioner of Public Safety 727 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 2007
State v. Polsfuss 720 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Polsfuss 720 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Fedziuk v. Commissioner of Public Safety 696 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2005
Fedziuk v. Commissioner of Public Safety 696 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2005
We have upheld the constitutionality of the pre-2003 versions of the Implied Consent Law in three decisions: Davis v. Comm’r of Public Safety, Hamilton v. Comm’r of Public Safety
State v. Henning 666 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2003
State v. Victorsen 627 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Victorsen 627 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
2000) ( (citation omitted)).
Nordvick v. Commissioner of Public Safety 610 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Nordvick v. Commissioner of Public Safety 610 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(citation omitted); see Parker v. Hennepin County Dist.
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc. 606 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc. 606 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hamilton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 600 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1999
Hamilton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 600 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1999
This amendment did not change or alter in any way the driver’s right to administrative review, judicial review, and Davis v. Commissioner of Pub.
State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleur 590 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1999
State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleur 590 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1999
8 We focus on the nature of the claimed compulsion and conclude that Morrow had a choice between treatment and confinement for a larger portion of his sentence, and that the “choice does not rise to the level of compulsion necessary in order to constitute a Fifth Amendment violation.”
Hamilton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 587 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Hamilton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 587 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In 1994, the Minnesota Supreme Court reviewed the issue of whether the immediate prehearing revocation of a driver’s license for violating the implied consent law still comports with due process, now that prompt hardship relief from immediate revocation is unavailable.
Brooks v. Commissioner of Public Safety 584 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Brooks v. Commissioner of Public Safety 584 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
893, 903 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976); (applying test to implied consent procedures).
In Re Conservatorship of Foster 547 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1996
In Re Conservatorship of Foster 547 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1996
(adopting the Mathews analysis).
State v. Parker 538 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Parker 538 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1995