CX-84-211
Precedential
Reversed
Processed
State v. Budke
Cited by
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State v. Verdon 727 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Scott 529 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Whitledge 500 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1993
- State v. Shields 423 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Vikeras 378 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Newstrom 371 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 1985
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Newstrom 371 N.W.2d 525
Opinion text
WAHL, Justice. Donald and Kathleen Budke were convicted of violating Minnesota’s compulsory school attendance law. On appeal, a three-judge district court panel reversed their convictions based on its belief that the Budke’s first amendment rights had been infringed. We affirm the reversal of the Budkes’ convictions for the reasons set forth in our opinion in State v. Newstrom, 371 N.W.2d 525 (Minn.1985). We do not reach the first amendment issues raised in this appeal. Affirmed.