Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Sand v. Sand, 379 N.W.2d 119.
-
In re the Marriage of: Angela Marie Backman, petitioner, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
14 change in circumstances.” (citing Rydell), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
-
In re the Marriage of: Heidi Marie Owens, petitioner, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(holding that an allegation of “poor health” alone is insufficient to meet appellant’s burden of proof), review denied (Minn. Jan.
- Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt 804 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-
Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt
804 N.W.2d 18
Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(emphasis added), review denied (Minn. Jan.
- Marriage of Hecker v. Hecker 568 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1997
-
Marriage of Hecker v. Hecker
568 N.W.2d 705
Minn. 1997
the appellate court appears to have suggested to the trial court that the reasons for Sandra’s failure to rehabilitate must be ascertained because, at the time of the dissolution, the parties contemplated that she would be the primary custodian of the children and, as far as the record was developed
- Marriage of Hecker v. Hecker 543 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
Marriage of Hecker v. Hecker
543 N.W.2d 678
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
ification where recipient "maximized her income”); (rejecting claim that recipient refused to rehabilitate), review denied (Minn. March 19, 1992); (affirming extension of temporary maintenance to permanent maintenance where recipient had "not been able” to become self-supporting); (affirming refusal to set aside stipulated step-reduction in permanent maintenance), review denied (Minn. Jan.
- Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 441 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 441 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Marriage of Prange v. Prange 437 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Marriage of Prange v. Prange 437 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Marriage of Joneja v. Joneja 422 N.W.2d 306 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Marriage of Miller v. Miller 409 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Miller v. Miller 409 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Cisek v. Cisek 409 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Cisek v. Cisek 409 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Hillestad v. Hillestad 405 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Hillestad v. Hillestad 405 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Burdick v. Burdick 407 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Burdick v. Burdick 407 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Schroeder v. Schroeder 405 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Schroeder v. Schroeder 405 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Flynn v. Flynn 402 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Marriage of Flynn v. Flynn
402 N.W.2d 111
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
2(b) “creates an affirmative obligation on the part of the spouse seeking maintenance to seek appropriate employment.” , 124 & n. 1 (Minn.Ct.App.1985) (spouse receiving permanent maintenance “did not incur an obligation to increase her earning power through occupational retraining”), pet.
- Marriage of Borchert v. Borchert 391 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Borchert v. Borchert 391 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Moore v. Sordahl 389 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Moore v. Sordahl 389 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1986