Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson, 444 N.W.2d 259.

23 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Rzeczkowski maintains that Minnesota Statutes section 519.11 (2022) govern enforceability of the DLMP.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
d 259, 261 (Minn. 1989) (remanding for “ further findings respecting substantive fairness requirements both at the inception and at the time of the dissolutio n”), overruled on other grounds by Kremer, d at 626.
In re the Estate of Margaret Peteler Bush, a/k/a Margaret Bush Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Estate of Margaret Peteler Bush, a/k/a Margaret Bush Minn. Ct. App. 2024
15 overruled on other grounds by Kremer, d at 626, and Kinney, d at 125.
In re the Marriage of: Bette Lou Gubbe Slag, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(overruled on other grounds by Kremer, d at 626).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We note in this regard that “Minnesota has long recognized the validity of antenuptial agreements which altered statutory schemes regulating the disposition of marital property.” d 259, 265 (Minn. 1989)
Kremer v. Kremer 912 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2018
Kremer v. Kremer 912 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2018
*622 McKee-Johnson v. Johnson
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer 889 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer 889 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
But we conclude that the Minnesota Supreme Court’s and d at 118, direct otherwise.
In re the Marriage of: Brian D. Peterson v. Joyce Marie Deeb Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Brian D. Peterson v. Joyce Marie Deeb Minn. Ct. App. 2015
–65 (Minn. 1989), overruled on other grounds by
In Re the Estate of Kinney 733 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 2007
In Re the Estate of Kinney 733 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 2007
Lillian cites two cases in support of the court of appeals holding that there is such a requirement:
Eisenschenk v. Eisenschenk 668 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Eisenschenk v. Eisenschenk 668 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
§ 519.11 (2002) (addressing premarital agreements); (same).
Pollock-Halvarson v. McGuire 576 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Pollock-Halvarson v. McGuire 576 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Kubes v. Kubes 534 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1995
Marriage of Kubes v. Kubes 534 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1995
The record on appeal does not support the trial court’s determination that enforcement of the agreement at the time of dissolution would be “unconscionable and unfair.”
In Re Estate of Aspenson 470 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re Estate of Aspenson 470 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1991