Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kelly, 435 N.W.2d 807.
- State v. Carney 649 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 2002
- State v. Jones 647 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Jones 647 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Stillday 646 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Stillday 646 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Mellett 642 N.W.2d 779 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Mellett 642 N.W.2d 779 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- In Re the Welfare of M.P.Y. 630 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 2001
- In Re the Welfare of M.P.Y. 630 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 2001
- State v. Yang 627 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Yang 627 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Matelski 622 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Matelski 622 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Santiago v. State 617 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Santiago v. State 617 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Gates 615 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 2000
- State v. Gates 615 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 2000
- State v. Bjork 610 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 2000
- State v. Bjork 610 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 2000
- State v. Duncan 608 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Duncan 608 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Chuon 596 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Chuon 596 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Flores 595 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1999
- State v. Flores 595 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1999
- State v. Williams 593 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1999
- State v. Williams 593 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1999
- State v. Carothers 585 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Carothers 585 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Williams 586 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1998
- State v. Williams 586 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1998
- In Re the Welfare of K.A.S. 585 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- In Re the Welfare of K.A.S. 585 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Beard 574 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Beard 574 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Smith 563 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- State v. Smith 563 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- State v. Nelson 562 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
State v. Nelson
562 N.W.2d 324
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
ANALYSIS Reviewing courts “largely defer to the trial court’s exercise of discretion in evidentiary matters and will not lightly overturn a trial court’s evidentiary ruling.” State v. Kelly
- State v. Mills 562 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1997
- State v. Mills 562 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1997
- State v. Jones 556 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1996
-
State v. Jones
556 N.W.2d 903
Minn. 1996
Although a trial court has substantial discretion when making evidentiary rulings, the defendant’s ability to confront the witnesses against him is a constitutional right.
- State v. Richards 552 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1996
- State v. Richards 552 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1996
- State v. Crims 540 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1995