Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kelly, 435 N.W.2d 807.
- State v. Crims 540 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Enger 539 N.W.2d 259 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
State v. Enger
539 N.W.2d 259
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
“Appellate courts largely defer to the trial court’s exercise of discretion in evi-dentiary matters and will not lightly overturn a trial court’s evidentiary ruling.”
- State v. Koskela 536 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1995
- State v. Koskela 536 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1995
- State v. Kelly 535 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1995
-
State v. Kelly
535 N.W.2d 345
Minn. 1995
On direct appeal this court affirmed the conviction, specifically holding that the trial court should have suppressed statements made by Kelly prior to receiving a Miranda warning, but the admission of the statements was not reversible error because of “the limited use of the statements for impeachment purposes”
- State v. Klosterboer 529 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Klosterboer 529 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Champion 517 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Champion 517 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Starkey 516 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1994
- State v. Starkey 516 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1994
- State v. Hawkins 511 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1994
- State v. Hawkins 511 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1994
- State v. Goldenstein 505 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Goldenstein 505 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Larson 502 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Larson 502 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Zimmer 478 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Zimmer 478 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Naylor 474 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1991
- State v. Naylor 474 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1991
- State v. Kobow 466 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. Kobow 466 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1991