Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite M.H. v. Caritas Family Services, 488 N.W.2d 282.

56 citing documents.

Raymond Kvalvog, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., (misrepresentation).
Larry Walters, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., d 282, 290 (Minn. 1992)), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Mark Krampf, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Servs., (stating 10 decision because there is no genuine issue of material fact as to whether the University violated the MGDPA.
Streambend Properties II, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
– 89 (Minn. 1992) (stating that omission is actionable as negligent misrepresentation, but such a claim is actionable only if a duty to disclose exists); see also Smith v. Woodwind Homes, Inc., (stating that “[a]n essential element of negligent misrepresentation is that the
In re 3M Bair Hugger Litig. 924 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re 3M Bair Hugger Litig. 924 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Caritas Family Servs ., , 290 (Minn. 1992) (reversing this court's reversal of denial of motion to amend complaint to add punitive-damages claim).
Regents of the University of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Caritas Family Servs.
Jeffrey Beckman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Robert A. Tenold v. Green Line Home Services, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jeffrey Beckman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Robert A. Tenold v. Green Line Home Services, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Caritas Family Servs.
Anthony Patrick Huber v. Jason R. Vohnoutka, Darlene Heimerl Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Anthony Patrick Huber v. Jason R. Vohnoutka, Darlene Heimerl Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Caritas Family Servs., (holding that plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to defeat defendant’s summary- judgment motion on plaintiff’s claim of negligent misrepresentation).
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
v. Caritas Family Servs., accord U.S. Bank N.A., d at 373.
Williams v. Smith 820 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2012
Williams v. Smith 820 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2012
v. Caritas Family Servs., (concluding that adoption agency with superior factual knowledge regarding health and genetic history of a child’s birth parents owed a duty to adoptive parents who sought information on that history); see also Florenzano, d at 175 (recognizing that insurance agent and “would-be financial adv
Jane Doe 43C v. Diocese of New Ulm 787 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Jane Doe 43C v. Diocese of New Ulm 787 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
v. Caritas Family Servs.
Voicestream Minneapolis, Inc. v. RPC Properties, Inc. 743 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2008
Voicestream Minneapolis, Inc. v. RPC Properties, Inc. 743 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2008
v. Caritas Family Servs., (upholding denial of motion to amend when no facts supported new claim).
Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Schroeder 693 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Schroeder 693 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
v. Caritas Family Seros., (upholding denial of motion to add tort claim when no facts supported claim).
Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLC 685 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 2004
Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLC 685 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 2004
v. Caritas Family Services
Heidbreder v. Carton 645 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2002
Heidbreder v. Carton 645 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2002
Dakota Bank v. Eiesland 645 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Dakota Bank v. Eiesland 645 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
v. Caritas Family Servs., (citation omitted).
Bebo v. Delander 632 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Bebo v. Delander 632 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
v. Caritas Family Servs., (upholding denial of mo *741 tion to add tort claim when no facts supported claim).
Marriage of Gully v. Gully 599 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1999
Marriage of Gully v. Gully 599 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1999
v. Caritas Family Servs.
Taeger v. CATHOLIC FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVS. 995 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Special Force Ministries v. WCCO Television 584 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Special Force Ministries v. WCCO Television 584 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
v. Caritas Family Servs., (failure of adoption agency to reveal child’s complete genetic background to prospective parents held actionable).
Smith v. Brutger Companies 569 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1997
Smith v. Brutger Companies 569 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1997
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
v. Caritas Family Services, Hubbard, d at 437-38 ; Langeland, d at 31-32 .
Gorham v. Benson Optical 539 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Gorham v. Benson Optical 539 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
v. Caritas Family Servs.
HB BY AND THROUGH CLARKE v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
H.B. ex rel. Clarke v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
HB BY AND THROUGH CLARKE v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
v. Caritas Family Servs., (listing eleven elements necessary for fraudulent misrepresentation claim).
H.B. ex rel. Clarke v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
v. Caritas Family Servs., (fist-ing eleven elements necessary for fraudulent misrepresentation claim).
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 533 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 533 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
v. Caritas Family Servs., (misrepresentation is concealing or not disclosing facts that one has a duty to disclose).
Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Dain Bosworth Inc. 531 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Dain Bosworth Inc. 531 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
v. Caritas Family Servs., (holding that adoption agency could owe a duty to prospective parents); L & H Airco, d at 379 (holding that an attorney does not owe a duty to the chent’s adversary); Florenzano, d at 174-75 (holding that an insurance agent does owe a duty to his or her client); Bonhiver, 311 Min
CPJ Enterprises, Inc. v. Gernander 521 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
CPJ Enterprises, Inc. v. Gernander 521 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
v. Caritas Family Servs., (upholding denial of motion to add intentional tort claim when no facts supported that claim); -96 (Minn.App.1991) (same).