Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lassen v. First Bank Eden Prairie, 514 N.W.2d 831.

24 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Arnold contends that the documents are not “check s” on the grounds that “a cashier’s check is a check that a bank draws on itself,” n.7 (Minn. App. 1994) (emphasis added), rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 1994), and that the United States Department of the Treasury, which is referenced in the documents, is not a “ bank.” In making this argument, Arnold relies on the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), Minn. Stat. §§ 336.1-101 to 336.0A-306 (2024).
Central Specialties, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Central Specialties, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2024
at 125 ( rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 1994)), and that good faith means that a person’s actions are “done honestly, whether it be negligently or not,” id.
Cleveland-Cliffs Minnesota Land Development, LLC, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See, (“Speculative, remote, or conjectural damages are not recovera ble at law.” (citation omitted)), review denied (Minn. Jun.
Patrick Dean, Joan Hunziker-Dean, individually and as derivative representatives of the Center Plaza Association of Rochester, Inc., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Speculative, remote, or conjectural damages are not recoverable at law.” review denied (Minn. June 29, 1994 ).
Plaza Holdings, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Byrd , d at 231 ( explaining that 9 standing requires more than speculation); (“Speculative, remote, or conjectural damages are not recoverable at law.” (citation omitted)), review denied (Minn. Jun.
Jane Doe v. Kmart Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jane Doe v. Kmart Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[D]amages recoverable in contract actions are those arising naturally from the breach or those which can reasonably be supposed to have been contemplated by the parties when making the contract as the probable result of that breach.” review denied (Minn. June 29, 1994).
Isanti Estates, LLC v. McCarthy Well Company, McCullough & Sons, Incorporated d/b/a McCullough & Sons Well Drilling, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Isanti Estates, LLC v. McCarthy Well Company, McCullough & Sons, Incorporated d/b/a McCullough & Sons Well Drilling, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Specifically, there is no documentation in the record that Isanti Estates acquired Pump #1 when it purchased the Park; therefore, Isanti Estates cannot prove it ever had a property interest in Pump #1.4 A “plaintiff’s lack of an enforceable interest in the subject property is a complete defense against conversion.” (Minn. App. 3 According to an invoice from McCarthy in 1991 the pump tested satisfactorily at the time, but “the motor [was] dated 1981 and the manufacturer [of the motor] only recomm
Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 831, 838 (Minn. App. 1994), review denied (Minn. June 29, 1994); Minn. Stat. § 604.14 (2014).
Swanny of Hugo, Inc., d/b/a Carpenter's Steak House v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Swanny of Hugo, Inc., d/b/a Carpenter's Steak House v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This rule provides that consequential damages for breach-of-contract claims are generally prohibited unless the damages are “those arising naturally from the breach or those which can 7 reasonably be supposed to have been contemplated by the parties when making the contract as the probable result of that breach.”
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
But a “plaintiffs lack of an enforceable interest in the subject property is a complete defense against conversion.” review denied (Minn. June 29, 1994); see also Larson v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., 226 Minn. 315, 317
State v. Lilleskov 658 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Lilleskov 658 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. June 29, 1994).
Prairie Island Indian Community v. Minnesota Department of Public Safety 658 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Prairie Island Indian Community v. Minnesota Department of Public Safety 658 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
( review denied (Minn. June 29, 1994)).
Sterling Capital Advisors, Inc. v. Herzog 575 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Sterling Capital Advisors, Inc. v. Herzog 575 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
review denied (Minn. June 29, 1994).
Olson v. Moorhead Country Club 568 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Olson v. Moorhead Country Club 568 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
review denied (Minn. June 29,1994).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by