Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Deli v. Hasselmo, 542 N.W.2d 649.

38 citing documents.

Timothy Michaels, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Joint Revocable Trust Agreement of John N. Charais and ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Joint Revocable Trust Agreement of John N. Charais and ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“[C]onsideration is what distinguishes a contract from a gift.”), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Eric S. Walker, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Apr.
Mark Moe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Lindmark Endowment for Corporate-Business Ethics Fund. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“‘Consideration’ is an act or forbearance that induces a contractually binding promise.” (“Consideration is something of value given in return for a performance or promise of performance that is bargained for .
Andrew Carufel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Deli v. Hasselmo , -54 (Minn. App. 1996), review denied (Minn. Apr.
A17-0997 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Consideration does not include “[a] promise to do something that one is already legally obligated to do.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Kristyn Nicole Schouweiler Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kristyn Nicole Schouweiler Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Consideration is something of value given in return for a performance or promise of performance that is bargained for; consideration is what distinguishes a contract from a gift.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
Cityscapes Development, LLC v. Larry Scheffler 866 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Cityscapes Development, LLC v. Larry Scheffler 866 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“Consideration is something of value given in return for a performance or promise of performance that is bargained for .
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center v. Avera Marshall 836 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center v. Avera Marshall 836 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“A promise to do something that one is already legally obligated to do does not constitute consideration.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
Long v. Creighton 670 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Long v. Creighton 670 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 652 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2002
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 652 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2002
-54 (Minn.App.), review denied (Minn. Apr.
American Federation of State, County Municipal Employees, AFSCME Union Local 3456 v. Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 645 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
American Federation of State, County Municipal Employees, AFSCME Union Local 3456 v. Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 645 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
review denied (Minn. April 16, 1996).
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 633 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 633 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-54 (Minn.App.1996), review denied (Minn. Apr: 16, 1996).
Wiegel v. City of St. Paul 627 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Wiegel v. City of St. Paul 627 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Consideration is “something of value given in return for a performance or promise of performance,” rev iew denied (Minn. Apr.
Washington v. Independent School District No. 625 610 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Washington v. Independent School District No. 625 610 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
review denied (Minn.Apr.16,1996).
Brooksbank v. Anderson 586 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Brooksbank v. Anderson 586 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
revieiv denied (Minn. Apr.
Estate of Peterson 579 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Estate of Peterson 579 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
*491 (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Deli v. University of Minnesota 578 N.W.2d 779 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Deli v. University of Minnesota 578 N.W.2d 779 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Fieno v. State 567 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Fieno v. State 567 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
655 (Minn.App.1996) (employee discharge was final disposition of disciplinary action), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Everest Development, Ltd. v. City of Roseville 566 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Everest Development, Ltd. v. City of Roseville 566 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Examiners, review denied (Minn. App. 16, 1996).