Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Hecker v. Hecker, 568 N.W.2d 705.
- In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- In re the Marriage of: Beverly Abuzzahab v. Faruk Said Abuzzahab Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- In re the Marriage of: Beverly Abuzzahab v. Faruk Said Abuzzahab Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- In re the Marriage of: Terry John Hietpas v. Barbara Elizabeth Reed f/k/a Barbara Elizabeth Reed Hietpas Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
In re the Marriage of: Terry John Hietpas v. Barbara Elizabeth Reed f/k/a Barbara Elizabeth Reed Hietpas
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(concluding it was appropriate to offset spousal-maintenance award by wife’s ability to earn when she did not take any efforts to rehabilitate herself).
- In re the Irrevocable Trust of Kristin N. Kuelbs, Donald C. Hill and Edwardena C. Hill, Trustees In … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
In re the Irrevocable Trust of Kristin N. Kuelbs, Donald C. Hill and Edwardena C. Hill, Trustees In …
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
–82 n.2 (Minn. App. 1996), aff’d
- In re the Marriage of: Heather Santilli Gamble v. John Stebbins Gamble Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
In re the Marriage of: Heather Santilli Gamble v. John Stebbins Gamble
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
d 705, 709–10 (Minn. 1997).
- Marriage of Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen 767 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-
Marriage of Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen
767 N.W.2d 711
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(‘Although the trial court is vested with broad discretion to determine the propriety of a modification, we have suggested that trial courts exercise that discretion carefully and only reluctantly alter the terms of a stipulation gover
- Maschoff v. Leiding 696 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Maschoff v. Leiding
696 N.W.2d 834
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(noting, in context of motion to modify stipulated maintenance award, that stipulation identifies “baseline circumstances” against which claims of changed circumstances are evaluated).
- Marriage of O'Donnell v. O'Donnell 678 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
Marriage of O'Donnell v. O'Donnell
678 N.W.2d 471
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
But, the existence of a stipulation does not “bar later consideration of whether a change in circumstances warrants a modification.”
- Marriage of Kielley v. Kielley 674 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
Marriage of Kielley v. Kielley
674 N.W.2d 770
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(noting, in the context of stipulated maintenance, that the stipulation identifies the “baseline circumstances” against which claims of changed circumstances are evaluated).
- Youker v. Youker 661 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Youker v. Youker 661 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Kemp v. Kemp 608 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Kemp v. Kemp 608 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Vangsness v. Vangsness 607 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Vangsness v. Vangsness
607 N.W.2d 468
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
2 (requiring respondent’s brief to conform to same requirements as appellant’s brief); , 681-82 n. 2 (Minn.App.1996) (noting “material assertions of fact in a brief properly are to be supported by a cite to the record” and stating such cites are “particularly important” where “the record is extensive”), aff'd
- Marriage of Rogers v. Rogers 606 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Marriage of Rogers v. Rogers
606 N.W.2d 724
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-10, n. 3 (Minn.1997) (in .maintenance context, failure to obtain status assumed by judgment can be substantial change in circumstances justifying modification).
- Cole v. Star Tribune 581 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Cole v. Star Tribune
581 N.W.2d 364
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Further, citations to the record “are particularly important where, as here, the record is extensive.” , 681-82 n. 2 (Minn.App.1996), aff'd
- Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 578 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg
578 N.W.2d 817
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
2(a) (support may be modified upon showing of substantially changed circumstances rendering existing award unreasonable and unfair); (moving party has burden to show changed circumstances); cf. Marriage of Hecker, (frustration of expectations on which judgment is based can constitute substantial change in circumstances justifying maintenance modification).