DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Hecker v. Hecker, 568 N.W.2d 705.

130 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Kimberly JoAnn Wauzynski, n/k/a/ Kimberly JoAnn Denne, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
–10 (Minn. 1997); Maiers, d at 668.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Ronald Lee Henrichs, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 705, 708-10 (Minn. 1997); Maiers, d at 668.
A19-1332 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(child support) ; Hecker v. Hecker , -10 (Minn. 1997) (spousal maintenance).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Herman Goldenberg, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Hecker v. Hecker , (holding that maintenance recipient’s inability to meet her needs frustrated “the parties’ expectations of self -sufficiency” and constituted a substantial change in circumstances); 22 (“If, despite the obligee’s reasonable efforts, the spo
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Benjamin Walter Eidem, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Michael James Pudlick, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A stipulation provides t he “baseline circumstances against which claims of substantial change are evaluated.”
In re the Marriage of: Mary Elizabeth Moline, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Hecker v. Hecker , d 705, 709 (Minn. 1997).
Criticized In re the Matter of: Dennis J. Arvig, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
2(a); (addressing modification of spousal maintenance).
In re the Marriage of: Lauri Sue Browning, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Mark Allen Kedrowski, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Hecker v. Hecker , , 709-10 (Minn. 1997).
In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
2(a), (b) (2018); (separating the analysis for both inquiries).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 705, 709-10 (Minn. 1997).
In re the Marriage of: Deann Kay Wells, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Dennis D. Dickinson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Damian Loth, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Michelle E. Li-Kuehne, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Lee Charles Bloomquist, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-10 & n.3 (Minn. 1997) (stating, in the context of a motion to modify spousal maintenance, that the frustration of an as sumption underlying the existing award can constitute the change in circumstances necessary to allow modification of that award).
Teresa J. Bulen, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Jason John Helms, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Michele Lura Honderich-Flannery, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Id.; see Hecker v. Hecker , (making a similar observation in the context of spousal maintenance).
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-10 (Minn. 4 1997) (maintenance); Moylan v. Moylan , (support).
John Frederick Stolte, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Hecker v. Hecker , ; , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Michael R. Shreve, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Jose Flores Moran, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Maria F. Olson v. James Scott Kent Peoples National Bank of Mora Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Maria F. Olson v. James Scott Kent Peoples National Bank of Mora Minn. Ct. App. 2016
678, 681 n.2 (Minn. App. 1996), aff’d
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Julie Ellen O�Mara-Meyer v. William Philip Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Julie Ellen O�Mara-Meyer v. William Philip Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A stipulation is significant in the context of a motion to modify maintenance as “the identification of the baseline circumstances against which claims of substantial change are evaluated.”
In re the Marriage of: Roger Alan Roy v. Bonnie LaMay Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Roger Alan Roy v. Bonnie LaMay Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster v. Larry Dean Foster Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster v. Larry Dean Foster Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Laura M. Engelhart, n/k/a Laura Hoss v. Robert J. Engelhart Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Laura M. Engelhart, n/k/a Laura Hoss v. Robert J. Engelhart Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the Marriage of: Susan Kay Schneider v. Michael John Schneider, Lyon County, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the Marriage of: Susan Kay Schneider v. Michael John Schneider, Lyon County, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Alyssa Aileen Rex, f/k/a Alyssa Aileen Nicoski v. Steven Edward Nicoski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Alyssa Aileen Rex, f/k/a Alyssa Aileen Nicoski v. Steven Edward Nicoski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015