Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Gustafson, 610 N.W.2d 314.
- State v. Jackson 726 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 2007
-
State v. Jackson
726 N.W.2d 454
Minn. 2007
Finally, “a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel that cannot be decided on the district court record because it requires additional evidence need not be brought on direct appeal and may be brought in a postconviction petition.” (indicating that, when the existing record is insufficient to evaluate counsel’s decisions, a claim of ineffective assistance is properly raised in a postconviction proceeding).
- State v. Wembley 712 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- State v. Wembley 712 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- State v. Johnson 699 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
State v. Johnson
699 N.W.2d 335
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
l(3)(a) (requiring defense to give notice of defenses, including self-defense, before omnibus hearing); *342 (stating that self-defense is affirmative defense and defendant must give notice of intent to rely on self-defense).
- State v. Martin 695 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2005
-
State v. Martin
695 N.W.2d 578
Minn. 2005
(holding that where the defendant raised claims that required additional fact-finding to explain the attorney’s decisions, a postconviction hearing was the appropriate forum).
- State v. Christian 657 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 2003
- State v. Christian 657 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 2003
- State v. Lewis 638 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Lewis 638 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Xiong 638 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
State v. Xiong
638 N.W.2d 499
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(holding that a claimant should raise an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a postconviction proceeding rather than on direct appeal).
- State v. Crowsbreast 629 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 2001
- Followed State v. Crowsbreast 629 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 2001