Cited by

“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”

(“Therefore, while we decline to reach the merits of this issue, Gustafson’s right to pursue an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a petition for postconviction relief is preserved.”).

of a reasonably competent attorney would perform under similar circumstances.” d 314, 320 (Minn. 2000) (quotation omitted).

any conclusions reached by this court would be pure speculation.” (declining to reach appellant’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim but preserving appellant’s right to pursue it in a petition for postconviction relief).

“Generally, an ineffective- assistance-of-counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”

“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”

“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.” State v. Gustafson

(“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”).

“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”

“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”

“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.” State v. Gustafson

“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.” (“Because we cannot, on the record presented, determine whether Leake was denied effective assistance of counsel in connection with advice he received from his trial counsel about the consequences of rejecting a plea offer, we remand to th

“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”

In his brief to this court, Omar argues that “defense counsel never raised the affirmative defense of an alternative perpetrator to the jury in the trial proceedings.” “Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.” d 314, 321 (Minn. 2000).

“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”

(preserving appellant’s right to pursue ineffective- assistance-of-counsel claim in a petition for postconviction relief when record on appeal is inadequate to resolve claim).

(“A postconviction hearing provides the court with additional facts to explain the attorney ’s decisions, so as to properly consider whether a defense counsel’s performance was deficient ”) (quotation omitted) .

“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”

“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”

“Generally, an ineffective 5 assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petiti on for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”

[that] a reasonably competent attorney would perform under similar circumstances.” d 314, 320 (Minn. 2000) (quotation omitted).

“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.”

9 (providing that the district court “may at any time correct a sentence not authorized by law”); (declining to review claim of ineffective assistance of counsel due to insufficient record but preserving the issue for postconviction review).

“Generally, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised in a postconviction petition for relief, rather than on direct appeal.” State v. Gustafson

(declining to reach merits of claim on the grounds that the appellate record was insufficient for review).

See State v. Gustafson , (affirming appellant’s conviction without prejudice to appellant’s right to raise claims in a postconviction proceeding).

(holding that a defendant who gave no notice of self -defense and did not mention that theory at trial could not argue that the district court had plainly erred by failing to provide a self-defense jury instruction sua sponte, even though the evidence may have supported a self-defense claim).