Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hurrle v. County of Sherburne Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners, 594 N.W.2d 246.

26 citing documents.

Jacob Robuck, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Basim Sabri, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Comm’rs, is misplaced.
LeRoy J. Rossow, Jr., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Comm’rs, review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re Complaint Brought on Behalf of Student 1 and All Students in the Functional Skills Program at … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“When an agency performs the quasi-judici al function of receiving and weighing evidence, making factual findi ngs, and applying a prescrib ed standard to reach a conclusion, a reviewing court applies the substantial-evidence test.” (quotation omitted).
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Sherburne, see also PTL, LLC v. Chisago Cnty.
Independent School District No. 12 v. Minnesota Department of Education 767 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Independent School District No. 12 v. Minnesota Department of Education 767 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Independent School District No. 281 v. Minnesota Department of Education 743 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Independent Sch. Dist. v. DEPT. OF EDUC. 743 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Independent Sch. Dist. v. DEPT. OF EDUC. 743 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Independent School District No. 281 v. Minnesota Department of Education 743 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Independent Sch. Dist. v. DEPT. OF EDUC. 742 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Independent School District No. 192 v. Minnesota Department of Education 742 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Independent School District No. 192 v. Minnesota Department of Education 742 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“When an agency performs the quasi-judicial function of receiving and weighing evidence, making factual findings, and applying a prescribed standard to reach a conclusion, a reviewing court applies the substantial-evidence test.” (quotation omitted).
Independent Sch. Dist. v. DEPT. OF EDUC. 742 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Watab Township Citizen Alliance v. Benton County Board of Commissioners 728 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Watab Township Citizen Alliance v. Benton County Board of Commissioners 728 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Independent School District No. 709 v. Bonney 705 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Independent School District No. 709 v. Bonney 705 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
“When an agency performs the quasi-judicial function of receiving and weighing evidence, making factual findings, and applying a prescribed standard to reach a conclusion, a reviewing court applies the substantial-evidence test.” (quotation omitted).
PTL, LLC v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 656 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
PTL, LLC v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 656 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
of Shoreview, -25 (Minn.1981); BECA d at 463 ; Good Value Homes
West Circle Properties LLC v. Hall 634 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
West Circle Properties LLC v. Hall 634 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
This court has held that “[t]he denial or approval of a preliminary plat application is a quasi-judicial administrative decision * *
Beca of Alexandria, L.L.P. v. County of Douglas Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners 607 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Beca of Alexandria, L.L.P. v. County of Douglas Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners 607 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
“If an entity’s zoning ordinances specify standards to which a proposed plat must conform, it is arbitrary as a matter of law to deny approval of a plat which complies in all respects with the ordinances.” (quotation omitted).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by